[Lucene.Net] FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-02-15 Thread Prescott Nasser
Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us. Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 that the CMS is based on, which is making our commits a pain at the moment. Once that gets upgraded it should be relatively smooth sailing. It won't help us though if we want still p

Re: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Troy Howard
Speaking of github... we've got a 6 month old pull request hanging out there that really should be paid attention to. Just so folks know that we care about encouraging contributions. -T On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Troy Howard wrote: > My thought was just "we should host our documentation

Re: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Troy Howard
My thought was just "we should host our documentation externally" and RTD that was the first thing that came to mind.. You're right that tool chain is kind of unfortunate. Another option would be to use GitHub pages and just build our HTMl on the build server then push to GitHub to update it. Then

Re: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Christopher Currens
I guess it wouldn't be terribly difficult to do, we would have to convert all of the shfbproj to whatever doxygen uses. I do think it's a little weird to use the python-style of documentation in a .NET project however. I personally have never been a fan of python documentation in general simply b

Re: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Troy Howard
My understanding is that ASF cares about what is hosted at ASF more than they care about what isn't hosted at ASF... So you're free to do whatever you like externally, hence the GitHub mirrors and NuGet and what not. Regarding readthedocs -- it uses Sphinx/ReStructured Text...So we'd have to conve

RE: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Prescott Nasser
So, from what I'm told by the site-dev guys, the first commit of docs would be a pain in the ass - becuase there are so many files. But as long as you are rarely updating docs, making other changes to your site should be quick. That has not been my experience in the past - but this time if it d

Re: [Lucene.Net] Blog Setup

2012-02-15 Thread Christopher Currens
That's similar to a suggestion Stefan made in another email: > The only alternative would be [...] running a > dynamic server on a dedicated VM. The later would > be easier to negotiate for a top level project. Though, his response seems to imply that it would need to stay hosted on Apache serv