On 2011-11-20, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I've updated the files - same location
Thanks a lot!
Hashes and sigs are good. All required legal files are in place. src
zip still matches the tag (so I didn't have to re-run RAT)
+1
Stefan
I've updated the files - same location
~P
> From: bode...@apache.org
> To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:34:16 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
ucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
+1 for wiki checklist & ticket for for build scripts to bundle all this
stuff for you.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Damn It - knew i was missing someth
t; Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34 PM
> To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
>
> On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > Third time is the charm:
>
> I'm afraid it is not.
>
> > ht
Damn It - knew i was missing something
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Stefan Bodewig
Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34 PM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote
On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Third time is the charm:
I'm afraid it is not.
> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
Sigs and hashes are good. Source zip and tag match except for the
build/lib/doc dirs that are only inside the tag and which I agree is a
g
gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:17:20 -0800
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
> >
> > So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the
> > source code,
0800
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
>
> So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the
> source code, and noticed something that we should probably discuss
> before votin
So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the
source code, and noticed something that we should probably discuss
before voting on the artifacts.
The files in Contrib\Analyzers are nowhere near in sync with 2.9.4...
Not sure how old they are exactly, but they are very diffe
Third time is the charm:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
I'll keep it open for 72 hours or so, then if all goes well, I'll make a vote
to the general@incubator
Thanks everyone for their help getting to this point.
~Prescott
+1
10 matches
Mail list logo
