Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-28 Thread Troy Howard
+1 for RC release. On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote: All, I updated the .src zip and associated checksums/signatures at: http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/2.9.2-incubating-RC2/dist/ Hopefully this one will pass the licensing validation! I

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-28 Thread Troy Howard
All, A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for another 4 hours (72 hours total). So far, we have two +1 votes in. After this vote, the release will be proposed to the Incubator PMC, and will have another 72 hour vote for acceptance there. Assuming that passes, it

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-28 Thread digy digy
+1 DIGY On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin g...@darkinsystems.comwrote: +1 On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote: All, A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for another 4 hours (72 hours total). So far, we have two +1 votes in.

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-28 Thread Sergey Mirvoda
+1 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, digy digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote: +1 DIGY On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin g...@darkinsystems.com wrote: +1 On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote: All, A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-28 Thread Prescott Nasser
+1 +1 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, digy digy wrote: +1 DIGY On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin wrote: +1 On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote: All, A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for another 4 hours

[Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Troy Howard
All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/2.9.2-incubating-RC2/dist/ SVN tag revision:

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:56 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Troy Howard
Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/2.9.2-incubating-RC2/dist/ SVN tag revision: http

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Troy Howard
read solution files between versions 7.0 and 9.0, inclusive. - Neal -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:56 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've updated the RAT reports at http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/Lucene.NET/ Binary looks good to me as I know the .xml files are generated, the source archive still contains a file licensed under the 1.1 version (TestSnowball.cs) and the .nunit, .config, .ndoc and build.xml files could

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-25, Troy Howard wrote: I updated the .src zip and associated checksums/signatures at: I have verified the bin zip is still the same that I checked. All signatures and hashes are fine, RAT is reasonably happy with the src zip (I've updated