t 11:37 AM, Granroth, Neal V.
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> No, the URL in DIGY's email apepars correct and the SVN revision
>> appears to be 1086410.
>> >>>
>> >>> Question: Should there be a tag for Lucene.Net_2_9_4 as ther
appears to be 1086410.
> >>>
> >>> Question: Should there be a tag for Lucene.Net_2_9_4 as there are for
> previous release candidates?
> >>>
> >>> - Neal
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Wya
gt;>> From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:15 PM
>>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> Cc: digy digy
>>> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4
>>>
>>> Thanks. For anyone watching, the
not 2009 ?
>
>
> - Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:23 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Troy Howard
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4
>
> Tag [+1]
>
>
, April 05, 2011 12:15 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: digy digy
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4
>
> Thanks. For anyone watching, the corrected clickable link is
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/.
>
> Also, just to make sure we a
esday, April 05, 2011 12:15 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: digy digy
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4
Thanks. For anyone watching, the corrected clickable link is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/.
Also, just to make sure we are looking at this right
Thanks. For anyone watching, the corrected clickable link is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/.
Also, just to make sure we are looking at this right, the revision we
should be using is 1089138 -- main thing is I've been in and out of
town, not caught up on anything
Sorry, no binaries. You can download the source from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C#/src/Lucene.Net
DIGY
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
> Actually about to dive into a big search tweaking spike in a certain
> project here, happy to do it on 2
Actually about to dive into a big search tweaking spike in a certain
project here, happy to do it on 2.9.4. Got binaries?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> We don't have any sort of QA report on the latest build. DIGY called
> for testing, but I haven't seen anyone respond to
Hey all,
I know we have a number of outstanding JIRA issues, but I think most of them
have been handled for the 2.9.4 release? Do we have anything outstanding that
is holding back a new release?
~P
10 matches
Mail list logo
