Re: Memory leak on 2.9.2

2010-05-20 Thread Robert Jordan
On 20.05.2010 10:46, Robert Jordan wrote: On 20.05.2010 04:25, Ayende Rahien wrote: With Lucene 2.9.1, if i created a new StandardAnalyzer and not close it, I wouldn't get a memory leak. That is because of the (slow) thread local implementation. The current implementation _requires_ closing Stan

Re: Memory leak on 2.9.2

2010-05-20 Thread Robert Jordan
On 20.05.2010 04:25, Ayende Rahien wrote: With Lucene 2.9.1, if i created a new StandardAnalyzer and not close it, I wouldn't get a memory leak. That is because of the (slow) thread local implementation. The current implementation _requires_ closing StandardAnalyzer, or you get a pretty sever, me

Memory leak on 2.9.2

2010-05-19 Thread Ayende Rahien
With Lucene 2.9.1, if i created a new StandardAnalyzer and not close it, I wouldn't get a memory leak. That is because of the (slow) thread local implementation. The current implementation _requires_ closing StandardAnalyzer, or you get a pretty sever, memory laek.