adds another layer of licensing complexity that I would
have to justify and defend.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:09 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Porting Automation - Sharpen
I don'
.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:52 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
I remember reading that IKVM is about 10% slower than Lucene.NET. Somewhere
else I saw t
ystems are broken - so how do we fix them? Teacher Evaluation 2.0 -
http://tntp.org/eval2.0
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 8:37 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
What
k it out at: http://www.ikvm.net/. If this works, it promises to
> > be
> > > > a very reliable way to convert the official java distribution to
> .NET.
> > > >
> > > > I will give this a shot soon and report back!
> > > >
> > > > Ryan Hoffman
rt correctly to a buildable solution, the extra overhead to convert
> is probably less painful.
>
>
> ~Prescott Nasser
>
>
>
>
> > From: m...@aaron-powell.com
> > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:25:18 +1100
> > Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
> >
..@aaron-powell.com
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:25:18 +1100
> Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> What's the performance of IKVM? I'm skeptical about having to spin up a Java
> VM inside .NET and the kind of overhead th
er Evaluation
> 2.0 - http://tntp.org/eval2.0
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:25 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
>
> Nice work Alex
hursday, November 04, 2010 10:25 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
Nice work Alex with getting the ball rolling.
I've decided to chuck the contents of that ZIP onto bitbucket (I hope you
don't mind) since it'll be easier to track the
Nice work Alex with getting the ball rolling.
I've decided to chuck the contents of that ZIP onto bitbucket (I hope you
don't mind) since it'll be easier to track the testing against it than
through an email. It's available here:
http://hg.slace.biz/lucene-via-sharpen
This is the raw package conte
I did an initial run of Lucene 3.0.2 through Sharpen. It stops when there is
an error or finds something it doesn't have a mapping for. I added some
placeholder mappings so it would at least get through a few files.
Here is a package of what I have so far:
http://convid.com/alex/lucene/Lucene.Net.
10 matches
Mail list logo
