...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 12:43 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
I think when I said I want all those things - I meant it as
an incremental, but something that we woudln't shy away from
doing like we've done so
something or feel we
should do
something. ~P
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:09 -0500
From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
Might I suggest that we all approach
: Friday, December 30, 2011 11:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
Andy,
You said far more eloquently exactly what I was trying to say. That is
exactly how I feel the project should progress.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Fri, Dec 30
Howard
Sent: 12/29/2011 2:19 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
My vote goes to merging the two:
Apply the same concepts from 2.9.4g to 3.X development, using
generics
where possible, Disposable vs
want something or feel we
should do
something. ~P
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:09 -0500
From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
Might I suggest that we all approach this as a business
One of the benefits of moving forward with the conversion of the Java
Lucene, is that they're using more recent versions of Java that support
things like generics and enums, so the direct port is getting more and more
like .NET, though not in all respects of course. I'm of the mind, though,
that
-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
One of the benefits of moving forward with the conversion of the Java
Lucene, is that they're using more recent versions of Java that support
things like generics and enums, so the direct port is getting more and more
of that?
From: digyd...@gmail.com To:
lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:45:23 +0200
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4gbut I guess the
future of 2.9.4g depends on the extent that it is becoming more
That's a great question - I know a lot of people like the generics, and I don't
really want it to disappear. I'd like to keep it in parity with the trunk. But
I know we also have a goal of making Lucene.Net more .Net like (further than
2.9.4g), and I don't know how that fits in. We are a
