21, 2011 10:07 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Michael - Could be wrong, but I think Nick might have gotten you
confused with Neal.
Regardless, I completely agree with everything you just said.
And, Yay for NuGet! Package
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
I am not against it, but personally think it as a toy.
I am from
Use a Lucene.Net core package for the core, and separate packages for each
contrib. That makes the most sense, and that is how most projects work. This
is also how Java Lucene does.
Don't create a nightly nuget package - nuget should only be used for
distribution packages
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
While it may be a bit redundant, why couldn't there be an individual
package for each piece of contrib and a Lucene.Net Contrib (All)
package that drags them all down.
That way users can grab just the bit they need, or if they just
[mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
@Digy, that could be done post build with ILMerge or build an additional
uber assembly that stores other assemblies
]
Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 7:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday
-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 7:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr
Not that old :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Punch cards or bust!
Sent from my Windows Phone
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
I am not against it, but personally think it as a toy.
I am from the generation where people used vi to write codes.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com]
Sent: Thursday
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
I am not against it, but personally think it as a toy.
I am from the generation where people used vi to write codes.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com
-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Right now there are two packages: Lucene Lucene.Contrib. My question
to the community is do you
://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell | Github
| BitBucket
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Right
://apowell.me | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell |
Github | BitBucket
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net
13 matches
Mail list logo
