t; > Quick test: http://www.aaron-powell.com/get/var-csharp-2.PNG
> > > >
> > > > I don't have VS 2008 though, this test was done with VS 2010 using
> the
> > > > multitargetting features
> > > >
> > > > Aaron Powell
> >
. 2.9.4 can
>> still
>> > be
>> > > built targeting .NET 2.0.
>> > > We can continue to support both version in parallel (in terms of bug
>> > fixes
>> > > such as LUCENENET-172 & LUCENENET-413, maybe LUCENENET-266) and
>> declare
>> > that
>
ing in IL level. So, I don't see a case to vote.
> If you think the code will be easier to read, use it. If not, don't.
>
> DIGY
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:54 PM
> To: lucene-net-de
on't see a case to vote.
If you think the code will be easier to read, use it. If not, don't.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:54 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
I'll sta
NENET-413, maybe LUCENENET-266) and declare that
> 2.9.4 will be the last version supporting 2.0 framework.
>
> DIGY
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:06 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@
ting 2.0 framework.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
Using var is wonderful and great. We'll hopefully do doing a lot of
refactoring in
A good blog about this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2011/04/20/uses-and-misuses-of-i
mplicit-typing.aspx
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 8:20 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene
t;> MVP - Internet Explorer (Development) | Umbraco Core Team
>> Member | FunnelWeb Team Member
>>
>> http://apowell.me | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell |
>> MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
escott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 May 2011 5:32 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] var
>
>
>
>
> ~Prescott Nasser
> prescott.nas...@hotmail.com
> 650.208.4205
>
> It's a 3.0 keyword, can't be u
5:32 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] var
~Prescott Nasser
prescott.nas...@hotmail.com
650.208.4205
It's a 3.0 keyword, can't be used pre C# 3.0
> From: m...@aaron-powell.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011
~Prescott Nasser
prescott.nas...@hotmail.com
650.208.4205
It's a 3.0 keyword, can't be used pre C# 3.0
> From: m...@aaron-powell.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 07:28:36 +0000
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] var
>
> My understan
ubject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
I think that is going to depend on if we are continuing .net 2.0 / C# 2.0
support or dropping it.
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Where do we stand on use of the var keyword?
>
..@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
>
> I think that is going to depend on if we are continuing .net 2.0 / C# 2.0
> support or dropping it.
>
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Where do we stand on use of the var keyword?
> >
I think that is going to depend on if we are continuing .net 2.0 / C# 2.0
support or dropping it.
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Where do we stand on use of the var keyword?
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
