ssage-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:15 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
I can't speak to many of the points as they are above my pay grade --
I'll let the lumaniries here deal with them. I can speak
I can't speak to many of the points as they are above my pay grade --
I'll let the lumaniries here deal with them. I can speak to a few of
the bullets:
2) Yes, searching for lucene.net on CodePlex does get one a number of
lucene related projects. But if someone is already searching for
"lucene.net
t-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Community Status
Hi Everyone,
Again, my apology for the long post, but like I did before, I am going to
reply in one post to answer and clarify questions around this subject --
again, my points and clarification below are in no particular ord
Just wanted to pipe in here... my company is also going to be
utilizing Lucene.net (I'm the Lucene evangelist) and I will definitely
be willing to start contributing to the update effort. I agree with
the points George made below... It'd be nice to get trunk up to date,
and be able to pull patches
George,
Great summary of everything that is going on with Lucene.NET. Once you
produce that actionable list of items I'm more than willing to help out
where I can.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Again, my apology for the long post, but like I did before,
Hi Everyone,
Again, my apology for the long post, but like I did before, I am going to
reply in one post to answer and clarify questions around this subject --
again, my points and clarification below are in no particular order or
importance.
1) SVN: Whatever backend source repository is used, as
o grok the internals.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Ciaran Roarty [mailto:ciaran.roa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:14 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
Also, and this is a persistent th
Just to be clear, there is a third option in all of this besides Attic or
Incubator and it is what I wrote in the original email. Remedy the 4 items
(quoted below) and then go to the Board to be a Top Level Project. Clearly,
the life in this thread shows that #1 can be met if people are willin
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
George
I don't think this conversation is over so I don't feel it requires a
new email thread.
In essence you are saying that everything should stay the same, am I
correct?
I am just curious , quite clearly JCLA ( because it is old ) knows
nothing about new language constructs, what it does then with all that.
Lucene 3.0.2
The API was cleaned up to make use of Java 5's generics, varargs, enums, and
autoboxing. New users of Lucene are advised to use this version fo
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Josh Handel wrote:
> One thing that has yet to be answered on this list is this :
>
> What does Apache Foundation provide, that the project does not received on
> its own OTHER than the name "Lucene".. I hear a lot of what Apache
> requests of us, beyond a name
Hi Everyone,
Rather than responding to each email, I will write up one response. The
points is in no significant order or priority.
1) IKVM: Since it doesn't give you source code, you end up with Java look
and fell, all the way from API to classes to exceptions. If this is
valuable option
ties to advance their development skills.
If the project were moved elsewhere, I do not think it would survive.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:01 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Community
.@catapultsystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:02 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; Lucene mailing list
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Community Status
One thing that has yet to be answered on this list is this :
What does Apache Foundation provide, t
Forking and going somewhere else certainly has the "grass is greener"
gleam to it.
The association with the much larger java Lucene community and the
expertise that community has (since the .NET community seems to be
mostly consumers of the tech, given the various comments about the
compl
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Granroth, Neal V. wrote:
>
> We've already been through this process once before. Why repeat?
Because clearly it didn't take the first time and this time the goal is to
demonstrate the community can stand on its own two feet as an Apache Top Level
Project (TLP).
cene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Lucene mailing list
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Community Status
A better way to put that is.. Thank you for the background, we would hate to
repeat history due to being un-aware of it..
Now to returned to our regularly scheduled repeat of histor
bject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Michael Mitiaguin wrote:
> I've been using Lucene.Net since 2005 and know its history quite well. Just
> some comments :
>
> 1. What actually PMC expects ?
At this point, I think the PMC expects to see a plan
Hi all
Sharpen from db4o could maybe replace jlca
My 2cents...
Vincent
Le 1 nov. 2010 à 21:55, George Aroush a écrit :
Let me jump in here and offer some perspective about Lucene.Net
(btw, it's not Lucene.NET :-) ). This is based on my past
involvement with the project -- since 2003 whe
ev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
Damn, you bet me to it. I was just about to post the same thing.
http://foodformonkeys.blogspot.com/2010/10/ngit.html
It was used here (recently - over the weekend I think) to port JGit into NGit
I'd stick my hand up - having u
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:55 PM, George Aroush wrote:
3) Put together an official Lucene.Net 2.9.2 and get it released.
George,
What's involved in #3? Just build the binaries, strip out the source
and zip up similar to the 2.0 release? I'd like to help get this out
the door.
thanks,
Arne C
little nudge in the right direction and I'll see
what I can do to help.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:56 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Comm
Let me jump in here and offer some perspective about Lucene.Net (btw,
it's not Lucene.NET :-) ). This is based on my past involvement with
the project -- since 2003 when it was on SourceForge.net and called
dotLucene.
1) Up until early this year, I have been porting and supporting
Lucene
On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Michael Mitiaguin wrote:
> I've been using Lucene.Net since 2005 and know its history quite well. Just
> some comments :
>
> 1. What actually PMC expects ?
At this point, I think the PMC expects to see a plan and action for either
going back to Incubation and bec
Hi Grant, George and all Lucene.Net community,
As a Lucene.Net committer, I didn't quit the project, but stopped
deliberately answering the questions and making commits to show no other
committers were willing to keep the project alive.(like Apache Board Report.
The only response from commiters wa
Hi,
You can count me in.
I will be glad to help keep Lucene .Net community alive as well as
contribute to development.
Dima
I'd be interested in providing some new blood for the commits.
I'm relatively new to Lucene, but a long time .NET developer.
Alex
On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
>
> Personally I don't care if Lucene.net is part of the ASF, in the incubator
> or hosted on CodePlex as standalone project, as long as there are releases,
> and some committers are working on it.
> Maybe Lucene.net could follow the same step
list, but I hope by doing so
> it gets some extra visibility.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- George
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:59 AM
> To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: ge
Grant,
I've been a user of lucene.net for years and would find its loss a
great setback to the community. I've spelunked through the code base a
bit here and there to track down issues, but have not been comfortable
enough to contribute. As a user i've been very happy with lucene.net
to t
rsoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:59 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:19 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Grant and all,
>
&
Hello, everyone!
I'm interested in helping to keep Lucene.net alive and well; Most of
my time available for open source development is required for another
project, so can't make commitments on contributing code (like helping
with porting, etc.).
I could fix bugs now and then, and help with testi
On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:19 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Grant and all,
>
> I will get engaged with the project again. The way I see it, by the end of
> the year, we must:
>
> 1) Clean up the website, and / or
> 2) Create an official release off the current trunk, and
> 3) Sometimes next year,
Thanks, Aaron.
By the way, to all others reading this: please do not reply to me privately.
It does nothing to help the community and in fact just reinforces in my mind
that the project is not sustainable at the ASF because people aren't willing to
publicly support it.
-Grant
On Oct 29, 2010
Hi Grant and all,
I will get engaged with the project again. The way I see it, by the end of
the year, we must:
1) Clean up the website, and / or
2) Create an official release off the current trunk, and
3) Sometimes next year, port the most current version of Java Lucene.
If by the end of the y
I'm sure I'm not the only one who would be really disappointed to loose
Lucene.Net from the .Net communities toolbox.
I'd be happy to offer up my services to keep the project alive. I'll admit I
don't know much about the way projects are run under the Apache umbrella,
but I'm keen to ensure that L
36 matches
Mail list logo
