ssage-
> From: Alex Thompson [mailto:pierogi...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:20 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
>
> Karell,
> What would be the problem with Lucene.Net in Azure?
>
> -Orig
lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
Karell,
What would be the problem with Lucene.Net in Azure?
-Original Message-
From: Karell Ste-Marie [mailto:stema...@brain-bank.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 6:01 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: d...@lu
:pierogi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:58 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
I don't think Lucene.Net staying a line-by-line port is craziness. We're not
saying that Lucene.Net is the one true implementation and there can be
e-
From: Andrew Busby [mailto:andrew.bu...@aimstrategic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 5:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
Dear All,
I have not yet spoken up on this issue yet but I felt that I could not sit in
silence any more.
I completely u
]
Sent: 17 November 2010 23:35
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene project announcement
Neal,
As you said, "If you're developing at the concept level the specific language
you use becomes unimportant. ".
This is exactly why we feel that working
ept
> level would find it more beneficial to join that brain-pool instead of
> diluting the effort by starting up elsewhere.
>
>
> - Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:55 PM
> To: lucene
: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:55 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
This topic has been coming back again and again which I have tried to
address multiple times, so let me try
ly, and thus we can't influence them.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project annou
to make
> suggestions and help steer the "standards"
>
>
>
>> From: paul.hadfi...@palmerharvey.co.uk
>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:13:48 +
>> Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
>>
>> It fee
, but once we are up
to parity, I don't see why we wouldn't have the ability to make suggestions and
help steer the "standards"
> From: paul.hadfi...@palmerharvey.co.uk
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:13:48 +0000
> Subject: RE
It feels to be that the problem is being approached a* about face (i.e. the
wrong way wrong). Maybe it is the way that ASF works but do the constraints of
Java define "Lucene, or should it bigger than that? Should Lucene be a full
text engine concept that can safely be developed in multiple la
11 matches
Mail list logo
