[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965634#action_12965634
]
Tsuria commented on LUCENENET-384:
--
Robert , you right. But the Official release is 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965676#action_12965676
]
Robert Jordan commented on LUCENENET-384:
-
Nope. There is no such thing like an
Unfortunately no, version 2.9.2 never completed the official release process.
Version 2.0.0.4 is last version for which an official binary release is
available.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:12 AM
To:
Agreed, building Lucene.NET from the source in SVN is simple.
However my understanding is that being able to compile a tagged version of the
source does not meet the ASF criteria for a release.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Hans (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, Decembe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965788#action_12965788
]
Neal Granroth commented on LUCENENET-384:
-
As noted in the lucene-net-dev discus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966005#action_12966005
]
Tsuria commented on LUCENENET-384:
--
Hello Neal.
I'm not the one who posted this bug.
It
