Hi,
lists should now be there (if they haven't been already) and be
moderated by Digy and myself. I'll ask infra to add Prescott as
moderator once he has his account ready.
On moderation: what has been the policy for moderating in posts by
non-subscribers so far? I know projects that will never
Hi,
the LUCENENET JIRA is now listed as project in incubation and Digy is
the new administrator. No other changes, so I think this piece of
infrastructure is done.
Stefan
Hi,
from re-rading the thread I find a few people who prefer confuence and
many who don't really care as long as it works. I'll ask infra for a
confluence instance shortly.
Stefan
On 2011-02-08, Digy (JIRA) wrote:
> Digy commented on LUCENENET-392:
>
> If no objections, I am going to commit it in a few days.
Generally in a healthy project it is way easier to ask for forgiveness
than for permission[1]. It is all under version control so th
On moderation: I don't think we had a specific policy. I have usually
allowed mails as long as it is related with Lucene.Net(and in English of
course)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:49 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lu
Hi Stefan,
I don't see it as a "request for permission". It is rather to inform people
about the change who may have different ideas and give a chance to comment
on it if this change breaks something in their own local copy.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode..
Would it make sense to also commit the analyzers that Prasha converted and
submitted here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372
~P
> From: digyd...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-392) Arabic Analyzer
> Date: Thu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-392.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
> Arabic Analyzer
> ---
>
> Key: LUCE
They all contain Apache License 1.1 and compatible with v1.4.3( for ex, they
don't implement ReusableTokenStream of Analyzer class)
There may be also other fixes in v2.9. I think they can wait till a complete
review.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotm
