[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-382.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved: https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/ - however, we need
On 2011-03-24, Scott Lombard wrote:
> It seemed to me that it may be possible that the ASF could come to an
> agreement with Versant and under a db4o Opensource Compatibility
> License (dOCL) allow a Sharpen variant in our repository.
I haven't followed the discussion as to why you think a fork i
On 2011-03-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-03-24, Scott Lombard wrote:
>> It seemed to me that it may be possible that the ASF could come to an
>> agreement with Versant and under a db4o Opensource Compatibility
>> License (dOCL) allow a Sharpen variant in our repository.
> I haven't followe
>
> > I haven't followed the discussion as to why you think a fork is
> > necessary. Do you think they'd understand your reasons and agree the
> > fork is a good idea?
>
Alex reached out to them. They said they are open to accepting patches, however
their repo and response times that Alex coul
Stefan, how do you read their licensing:
http://www.db4o.com/about/company/legalpolicies/docl.aspx
By your reading is it possible to include this in our repo to keep everything
together? or would this have to be outside the ASF?
> From: geobmx..
