[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-412) Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc. with appropriate Generics.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy updated LUCENENET-412: --- Attachment: IEquatable for Query&Subclasses.patch I am not sure about committing this "IEquatable" patch.

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-410) Lucene In Action (LIA book) samples for .NET.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030275#comment-13030275 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-410: --- Are these added here just for a

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-389) Ensure that released assembly is a signed Strong Named Assembly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-389. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Ensure that released assembly is a signed Strong Named Ass

[Lucene.Net] var

Where do we stand on use of the var keyword?

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Assigned] (LUCENENET-330) Search.Regex minimal port

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-330: - Assignee: Prescott Nasser > Search.Regex minimal port > --

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Assigned] (LUCENENET-371) Unit test for Search.Regex port

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-371: - Assignee: Prescott Nasser > Unit test for Search.Regex port >

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-330) Search.Regex minimal port

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030280#comment-13030280 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-330: --- Committed to 2.9.4g branch > Se

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-371) Unit test for Search.Regex port

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030281#comment-13030281 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-371: --- committed to Lucene.Net_2_9_4g b

Re: [Lucene.Net] var

I think that is going to depend on if we are continuing .net 2.0 / C# 2.0 support or dropping it. On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > Where do we stand on use of the var keyword? >

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Assigned] (LUCENENET-266) Putting support classes in separate files and in a separate directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-266: - Assignee: Prescott Nasser > Putting support classes in separate files and in

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

I recall us discussing this a bit, but I don't recall the outcome (couldn't find it in the mailing list archives either). Can anyone else find that thread? If not, what are people's feelings on this? I think at a certain point we can say we don't need .NET 2.0 going forward, but what point

RE: [Lucene.Net] Incubator PMC/Board report for May 2011 (lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org)

I've updated our report - please take a quick pass at it to see if anything is missing. > From: no-re...@apache.org > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 14:00:09 + > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Incubator PMC/Board report for M