ParallelMultiSearcher threads don't handle all exceptions
-
Key: LUCENENET-442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-442:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> ParallelMultiSearcher threads don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-442:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-442.patch
Thanks Andy.
Nice catch.
I prepared a patch for 2.9.4g and will commit to
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for sometime,
for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to package this up
and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks left to take care of?
~Prescott
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-442.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
Fixed for 2.9.4 & 2.9.4g
> ParallelMultiSearcher threads don't h
There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Twidle updated LUCENENET-442:
--
Description:
The ParallelMultiSearcher doesn't allow non-IOException exceptions thrown by
i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097245#comment-13097245
]
Andy Twidle commented on LUCENENET-442:
---
Fantastic, thanks Digy!
> ParallelMulti
It looks to me that same problem exists in lucene java source. Do you
think it is a bug in lucene java? Do you know any java lucene JIRA cases
or users complains related with same issue?
Andrei
On 05.09.2011 22:36, Digy (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097299#comment-13097299
]
x...@mail.ru commented on LUCENENET-442:
It looks to me that same problem exis
If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
RavenDB uses it?
At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2)
but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
unit-tests still run tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097312#comment-13097312
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-442:
The critical case in .NET is that a not-handled except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097325#comment-13097325
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-414:
I think the simplest solution for 2.9.4 will be adding
To avoid misunderstanding...
Community==all Lucene.Net users
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feed
Yeah, I looked at it as 2.9.4 has been around a while, I've been using it for a
while, and I assume others have as well, and we haven't had any complaints (few
exceptions).
I hope people aren't waiting for a "last call" to provide feedback. It should
be continous. When it dies down, I assu
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential
memory leaks
Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
signed patch applied to it?
2011/9/6 Digy
> To avoid misund
16 matches
Mail list logo
