Should we remove this? It looks like it's not part of the contrib for Java
3.0.3 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/contrib/ and
we have no tests for it.
Similarity is in a weird spot in the java repo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/contrib/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Should we remove this? It looks like it's not part of the contrib for Java
> 3
Jumping back into this debate... I still feel that automated porting is the
fastest way to get up to date and stay up to date.
So to that effect I finally got rolling on a fork of Sharpen which I have
made public here:
https://github.com/pierogitus/Grindstone
I've been using java Lucene 3.5 as my
New thread.. Alex any thoughts on how I could solve the error below? The java
files copied over to the new workspace, but I think that's as far as it got.
I'll dig around myself, just asking in case you've encountered this. Thanks~P
!SESSION 2012-03-03 16:51:41.229
Are you sure built it and exported to the correct folder?
The line numbers in the stack trace don't match up to the latest version.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 4:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sub
You were right - built it into the plugin folder, but it created it's own
plugin folder as well, so it was double nested. Got past that, and it looked
like it was going well, but about 2 minutes into the conversion I get out of
memory issues. I had a bunch apps open, closed them all down and ra
No never had a memory error.
I see it does get up to about 500MB but I got 12GB in my system and it
finishes in a minute flat.
If I take out the test folders from the conversion it only gets to 300MB.
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday,
My laptop isn't all that powerful, but 4gigs of ram should be sufficient for
this...
> From: pierogi...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Sharpen Error
> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:14:21 -0800
>
> No never had a memory error.
> I see it does get up to about 500MB b
