RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Michael Garski
ginal Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:35 PM To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values I shudder to think about what the higher-ups will say about the cost of faster storage. Th

Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Matt Honeycutt
nt: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:13 AM > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > > I can elaborate a little on what our *planned* approach for utilizing > SQL > Server is. I don't know if this will work, but I've done

RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Michael Garski
ycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:13 AM To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values I can elaborate a little on what our *planned* approach for utilizing SQL Server is. I don't know if this will work, but

Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Matt Honeycutt
1 600 > Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 12 November 2009 13:53 > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > > Yea

RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Moray McConnachie
rd Analytica http://www.oxan.com -Original Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 November 2009 13:53 To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Yeah, it is sort of like your standard faceting scenario

Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-12 Thread Matt Honeycutt
unding for each corresponding organization? > > Michael > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wed 11/11/2009 10:17 PM > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > &g

RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Garski
Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wed 11/11/2009 10:17 PM To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Well, let me prefix what I'm about to describe by saying that I know that I'm doing something with L

Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-11 Thread Matt Honeycutt
cs, > you'll encounter an IO hit on reading them. > > I'm curious why you are looking to grab all of the terms for a > ScoreDoc... can you shed some light on that? > > Michael > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] >

RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Garski
ng to grab all of the terms for a ScoreDoc... can you shed some light on that? Michael -Original Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:57 PM To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: FieldLookup for field with multiple

FieldLookup for field with multiple values

2009-11-11 Thread Matt Honeycutt
It seems that the StringIndex returned by FieldCache.Fields.Default.GetStringIndex() only indexes one value for a document even when the document has multiple values for the field. Is there a performant want to get all the values for a particular field in a ScoreDoc? I'm having to do this across