Lucene.net Nested Documents support (lucene version 3.4)

Hi everyone, We are currently implementing Lucene .net in our solution and we need to use the Lucene Nested Documents support that was introduce in Lucene version 3.4 If I understand correctly the current version of Lucene .net does not support this feature (and other 3.4 features), there is a time

RE: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues

Alright - I see Chris updated the 3.0.3 branch with the solution files and a quick fix for the NativeFSLockFactory. We've had some people downloading the pre-release packages (Lucene.Net.Contrib 11 times, Lucene.Net 23 times). Mostly all quiet regarding issues. Unless there are any i

Re: Newbie question (lucene.net version number)

Thank you Itamar. On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: > Lucene.Net 2.9.4 is compatible with the Java version bearing the same > version number, so is 3.0.3 > > We will soon begin porting the 3.6 version > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Omri Suissa &g

Re: lucene.net + contrib VS solar

Original Message > From: "Omri Suissa" > Sent: 8/7/2012 7:38:47 AM > To: "lucene-net-user" > Subject: lucene.net + contrib VS solar > > Hi all, > Our product is written in .net, that's why we prefer to integrate > lucene.net > . >

Re: lucene.net + contrib VS solar

d.com Original Message From: "Omri Suissa" Sent: 8/7/2012 7:38:47 AM To: "lucene-net-user" Subject: lucene.net + contrib VS solar Hi all, Our product is written in .net, that's why we prefer to integrate lucene.net . We want to create an indexing service that

Re: lucene.net + contrib VS solar

Yes, Lucene.Net is exactly what you want Solr is a search server, a wrapper around Lucene, and only available in Java On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Omri Suissa wrote: > Hi all, > Our product is written in .net, that's why we prefer to integrate > lucene.net > . > We want t

Re: Newbie question (lucene.net version number)

Lucene.Net 2.9.4 is compatible with the Java version bearing the same version number, so is 3.0.3 We will soon begin porting the 3.6 version On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Omri Suissa wrote: > Hi all, > We are testing to implement lucene.net in our solution and i was wondering &

FW: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator

fyi > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator > Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:58:23 -0700 > > > The vote passes with the following +1'

FW: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator

I've called a vote on the general incubator for our graduation: > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:40:53 -0

RE: How to start with LUCENE.NET

: How to start with LUCENE.NET Seconded. This book is essential. I went down many bad roads with Lucene.NET before reading this book. The book warned me about all of those bad choices and if I'd read the book sooner I could've avoided them. -Original Message- From: Noel [ma

RE: How to start with LUCENE.NET

Seconded. This book is essential. I went down many bad roads with Lucene.NET before reading this book. The book warned me about all of those bad choices and if I'd read the book sooner I could've avoided them. -Original Message- From: Noel [mailto:[email protected]] Sen

Re: How to start with LUCENE.NET

12 4:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: How to start with LUCENE.NET Hello all, What reources and books you recommend to I read and I learn for start with LUCENE.NET?

How to start with LUCENE.NET

Hello all, What reources and books you recommend to I read and I learn for start with LUCENE.NET?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1: my work depends on Lucene.net, so thank you everybody! :D 2012/7/11 Noel > +1, Job well done. > > -Original Message- From: Allan, Brad (Wokingham) > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:15 AM > To: 'lucene-net-user@lucene.**apache.org > ' > Cc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1, Job well done. -Original Message- From: Allan, Brad (Wokingham) Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:15 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' ; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

2012 10:17 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? +1, I am on board On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Todd Carrico wrote: > +1 > > tc > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1, I am on board On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Todd Carrico wrote: > +1 > > tc > > > > > Hey All, > > > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net > > project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the >

RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 tc > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net > project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the > Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a > top level project. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 On Sunday, July 8, 2012, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project > (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community > to see if the community is ready to govern itself

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 Em 09/07/2012 21:54, Gregory Bell escreveu: +1 Prescott Nasser 09/07/2012 3:44 AM >>> Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 >>> Prescott Nasser 09/07/2012 3:44 AM >>> Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top leve

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 On 07/08/2012 1:44 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. He

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 On 07/08/2012 1:44 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

:45 > Para: [email protected]; > [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Asunto: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? > > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project &

RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 Sendt fra min iPad Den 08/07/2012 kl. 19.45 skrev Prescott Nasser : > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project > (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to > see if the community is read

RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 DIGY -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 8:45 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? Hey All

RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

Rob, I don't think that graduating as a Lucene sub-project would be a good idea since Lucene.Net was once a sub project of Lucene before returning back to incubator. And I can not say that it was a good marriage. DIGY -Original Message- From: Rob Vesse [mailto:rve...@dotnetrd

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

2 points: 1. Graduating as a Lucene subproject doesn't make too much sense as there is hardly any relation between the two, and I can hardly see any benefit from going that route just because of expecting to gain more traffic. This is despite the fact that Lucene.NET is a direct port: t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 10:44:33 To: ; Reply-To: Cc: Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating

RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

well, I'll look into the differences in the process for that ~P > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? > Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:47:01 -0700 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

I will refrain from voting either way for now as I wanted to raise something. As a PMC member of another project (Apache Jena) that recently graduated from the Incubator I would raise one issue that the Lucene.Net PMC should consider which is whether the community meets the following

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

+1 for graduation I still think graduation should be in sync with the 3.0.3 release and a press release on work towards 3.6 and 4.0 releases. On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

My vote : +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

For me you get a +1 2012/7/8 Prescott Nasser > > Hey All, > > This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project > (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community > to see if the community is ready to govern itself

[VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I be

Index replication and sharding with Lucene.NET

Hi all, This is kinda of a hot topic now in the Java Lucene community, and I was wondering if anyone ever did anything like this with Lucene.NET? Basically, I'm trying to avoid writing such an implementation from scratch... Thanks, Itamar.

RE: Website link on lucene.net incubator page

updated > Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:11:40 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Website link on lucene.net incubator page > > I'm not sure who takes care of the website at > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/

Website link on lucene.net incubator page

I'm not sure who takes care of the website at http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ We moved our product page from one domain to it's own domain and were wondering who we talked to about getting the link on apache.org updated. If it's somebody in this mailing list: Unde

[Lucene.Net] Re: damaged zip file

Sorry ignore this, for some reason Chrome only downloaded 2.5M of file! On 3 March 2012 07:33, Richard Wilde wrote: > I seem to be running into an issue when trying to unzip (using winrar) > 2.9.4g from > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucene.net/source/2.9.4g-incubating/

[Lucene.Net] damaged zip file

I seem to be running into an issue when trying to unzip (using winrar) 2.9.4g from http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucene.net/source/2.9.4g-incubating/ This is the error I am getting:- ! C:\Users\rippo\Downloads\Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1.src.zip: The archive is either in

FW: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions

g it with a major release is > the best place to make it. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > From: Christopher Currens > Sent: 2/24/2012 2:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes bet

Re: [Lucene.Net] word breaking

Hi, The StandardAnalyzer ctor accepts a list of stopwords. :-) Anders Lybecker On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Christian Setzkorn wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am using this code to break some words in a Text: > > > > stringReader = new StringReader(Text); > > tokenStream = StandardAnalyzer.TokenStr

[Lucene.Net] word breaking

Hi, I am using this code to break some words in a Text: stringReader = new StringReader(Text); tokenStream = StandardAnalyzer.TokenStream("defaultFieldName", stringReader); // removes standard stopwords too Lucene.Net.Analysis.Token token = tokenStream.Next(); This works very well but

[Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Blog

Hey All, We've got a blog up and running: https://blogs.apache.org/lucenenet/. Right now we are taking the latest 3 articles and those are being posted onto our main Lucene.Net as news. But I'd like to try and get more regular content up on the blog. If you happen to write an a

RE: [Lucene.Net] faceting

Check out the wiki article that Leandro pointed to: https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/simple-faceted-search.html ~Prescott > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:30:54 +0530 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] faceting >

Re: [Lucene.Net] faceting

How can we implement faceted search with lucene.net without bobo..please tell me Regards, Karunaker On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Hey Leandro, I took a look at BoboBrowse.Net, it looks like a faceted > search on top of Lucene.Net. From what I can

RE: [Lucene.Net] faceting

Hey Leandro, I took a look at BoboBrowse.Net, it looks like a faceted search on top of Lucene.Net. From what I can tell it has built an API that is directly suited to faceted searching, rather than the more multi-purpose search Lucene.Net can offer. While Lucene.Net can do faceted search

[Lucene.Net] faceting

nhibernate, but is very slowly. I want to implement Lucene.NET with facets. The search are only with facets. What do you recomend? Thanks!

[Lucene.Net] RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.4 - Compound File and Multi File Behavior

[email protected] Objet : [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 2.9.4 - Compound File and Multi File Behavior I am noticing a behavior where the index is automatically switched to multi-file format from compound file format. It is easy to reproduce on my system. Basic Steps: 1. Create an index (default beh

[Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 2.9.4 - Compound File and Multi File Behavior

format from Compound to Multi-File) Sample code attached. After running for the first time, change the create flag to false and rerun in update mode. Is this normal behavior? I thought Lucene honors the format unless explicitly requested to change. I do not see this behavior in Lucene.Net 2.0

Re: [Lucene.Net] Problems with IndexSearcher

Thanks for the clarification Franklin - thanks for pointing me to those methods, they do exactly what I want and solve my issue perfectly :-) Cheers, Rob On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Franklin Simmons wrote: > The behavior is correct. At least with Lucene.Net 2.3.1,

RE: [Lucene.Net] Problems with IndexSearcher

The behavior is correct. At least with Lucene.Net 2.3.1, see IndexReader.IsCurrent() and IndexReader.Reopen(). -Original Message- From: Rob Vesse [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net

RE: [Lucene.Net] Problems with IndexSearcher

Vesse [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net] Problems with IndexSearcher Hi All I'm having an issue with IndexSearcher which I'm confused by, this may just be that I don't fully understand all th

[Lucene.Net] Problems with IndexSearcher

Hi All I'm having an issue with IndexSearcher which I'm confused by, this may just be that I don't fully understand all the intricacies of how Lucene works or it may be a bug I really have no idea but I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me. My problem boils down to inconsistent beha

RE: [Lucene.Net] reader.Terms order

Yes it is safe. This is the lucene's logic. DIGY -Original Message- From: Trevor Watson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net] reader.Terms order Hello! We populate a list of terms

[Lucene.Net] reader.Terms order

Hello! We populate a list of terms that users can filter with prefixes. (they type in a text box and as they type the list gets filtered). I was curious, when using reader.Terms(), is there a specific order the terms come out in? the code we use for it is terms = reader.Terms(new Lucene.Net

RE: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field?

Hi Brian, I think you can use "UnaccentedWordAnalyzer" in <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/contrib/Cor e/Analysis/Ext/Analysis.Ext.cs> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/contrib/Core /Analysis/Ext/Analysis.Ext.cs

Re: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field?

[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field? Importance: Low Hi, You could accomplish this by adding several FileNumber fields. I'm guessing that a regexp would suffice t

RE: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field?

-mail and delete all copies of this material from any computer. -Original Message- From: Simon Svensson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field? Impor

Re: [Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field?

Hi, You could accomplish this by adding several FileNumber fields. I'm guessing that a regexp would suffice to extract the number from the complete value. var document = new Document(); document.Add(new Field("FileNumber", "ABC-12345", Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED)); document.Add

[Lucene.Net] How best to leverage Lucene to index my field?

I have some data (files) that have prominent identifiers (file numbers) that users often know the files by. File numbers are in the form of "[group]-[number_within_region]". For example, "ABC-12345" and "XYZ-12345". Today, I add a non-analyzed Field named "FileNumber" with that full value. H

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g

there already. Thanks, Christopher On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > That's a great question - I know a lot of people like the generics, and I > don't really want it to disappear. I'd like to keep it in parity with the > trunk. But I know we a

RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g

That's a great question - I know a lot of people like the generics, and I don't really want it to disappear. I'd like to keep it in parity with the trunk. But I know we also have a goal of making Lucene.Net more .Net like (further than 2.9.4g), and I don't know how th

[Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g

I was browsing "Roadmap" emails from November in Lucene developer list. It remains unclear in what state Lucene 3 porting is , but my question more about 2.9.4g . Is it kind of experimental dead end variation of 2.9.4 with generics ? Am I right in classifying it as more .Net like 2.9.4 which is

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

2/2011 10:52 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Troy Howard Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication? My manager always harps more and more on the speed aspect of the program I'm developing. It's hard to make him understand that adding anyt

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

The product I work on has a need for performing arbitrary report-style queries against relational data, including predicates which are difficult to express to the database's own full-text search engine. We developed an in-house solution which combines SQL and Lucene queries. It does this by rewriti

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

Does RavenDB support full Lucene queries? Proximity searching or range searching for example? that would be great. (if i could interest my boss in shelling out the cash for it). On 12/22/2011 1:56 PM, Wyatt Barnett wrote: For pulling it into a database, check out ravendb -- you can get the

RE: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

Does updating a document not work? Indexwriter.updatedocument. Rather than remove and recreate and insert? Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Watson Sent: 12/22/2011 10:52 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Troy Howard Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

For pulling it into a database, check out ravendb -- you can get the best of both worlds as it is a pretty slick document database while also making heavy use of lucene to power the entire indexing engine. On Thursday, December 22, 2011, Trevor Watson wrote: > My manager always harps more and mor

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

My manager always harps more and more on the speed aspect of the program I'm developing. It's hard to make him understand that adding anything is going to add time. In terms of using an index to keep track of tagging of documents, if we were to keep the data in a single index, as far as I kno

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

Trevor, It's a little unclear from your initial description why you want to segregate tagged data in a second index. What is the purpose of the tagging? Generally tagging is not a binary operation, but rather a form of user generated data inversion. I encourage you to adopt a design strategy that

Re: [Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

I think sometimes i need to just type an email to myself to get my thoughts out of my head. Would it be possible to implement a custom filter that does a search on each result from the "contents" index on the "tagged" index. The only problem I have with that would be the overhead cost of open

Re: [Lucene.Net] Moving Documents from one index to another

Using the TermVectorMapper I was able to "rebuild" the contents field and after a bit of digging found that I had to remove a field before adding it back or I got strange behavior. Thanks for your time! On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Trevor Watson wrote: > Update: > > I've managed to get the

[Lucene.Net] Common ID Field across Indices - MultiSearcher and de-duplication?

Sorry to keep bothering you all. I'd like to create a 2nd index for my project for "tagging" items in the document set. This way, it would be significantly easier to manage the tagged documents (add/remove/mass delete) than to deal with them in the existing index (where I would have to re-build f

Re: [Lucene.Net] Moving Documents from one index to another

Update: I've managed to get the information to move from one index to the other with the exception of the file contents (you know, the important field).The other fields are stored in the index, but I suspect that the content field is not being moved as it is not stored, but rather sav

[Lucene.Net] Moving Documents from one index to another

Hello! We currently have made a utility that writes the contents of files to a Lucene index and then allows the user to search the contents of these files. We had a client who had a job that was too large to process on a single computer, so we split it up amongst multiple computers and now w

[Lucene.Net] Implementing custom similarity measurment

I've used the fuzzy query with a lot of success but I also have an alternative algorithm to the levenshtein edit distance that I'd like to try out with Lucene. What would I need to do to run my algorithm against a Lucene Index?

RE: [Lucene.Net] What would be the best way to index and search my data?

earch' -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 16 December 2011 19:30 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] What would be the best way to index and search my data? I guess there could be a couple of ways to go about this. Let me th

RE: [Lucene.Net] What would be the best way to index and search my data?

line i can help get those ported over quickly. -Prescott From: Andy McCluggage Sent: 12/14/2011 5:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net] What would be the best way to index and search my data? I've found multiple questions that hav

[Lucene.Net] What would be the best way to index and search my data?

I've found multiple questions that have been asked in various placed online (including StackOverflow ) that ask questions along the lines of "How can I index and then search relational

RE: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

- From: Sean Newham [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 December 2011 15:25 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index Ah, I see. Maybe I should do this somewhere else. Thank you both for your help, Sean -Original Message- From: Wyatt

Re: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

Sean Newham To: "[email protected]" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:25 AM Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index Ah, I see. Maybe I should do this somewhere else. Thank you both for your help, Sean -Original Message- From: Wyatt Barnett [ma

RE: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

Ah, I see. Maybe I should do this somewhere else. Thank you both for your help, Sean -Original Message- From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 December 2011 15:22 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index We do some

Re: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

We do some tracking of this ourselves, and I don't think lucene has this sort of capability as it is something that makes alot more sense to handle on the application layer where it understands the semantics of your search. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Kevin Miller wrote: > We do this but it

Re: [Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

We do this but it involves logging the search query to a database. We have an abstraction about search clients to do this. I recommend the Lucene In Action book. Quite good. On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Sean Newham wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to Lucene, and I was wondering if there was a quick, code

[Lucene.Net] Decoding an index

Hi, I'm new to Lucene, and I was wondering if there was a quick, code way (preferably in c#, but I'll take python or java) of getting the list of most common search queries out. I've done a google, and found Luke (which is cool) and may start looking through its code as it clearly must be doing

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net - first Stp

quot;Thomas" escreveu: > > > Hi! > > > > I'm newbie and have a great headache to use Lucene.net. > > I downloaded the \2.9.4 - Source\src\core and simply do not know how to > > make it work. Is there a document that explains the initial steps? > > I don&#x

RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net - first Stp

ows Phone From: Thomas Sent: 12/6/2011 12:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net - first Stp Hi! I'm newbie and have a great headache to use Lucene.net. I downloaded the \2.9.4 - Source\src\core and simply do not know how to make it work. Is there a

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net - first Stp

I bought Lucene in Action from Amazon. Despite the fact it‘s a java based book it‘s a must have book for anyone who want use Lucene. Best regards, John Prado Em 06/12/2011 18:04, "Thomas" escreveu: > Hi! > > I'm newbie and have a great headache to use Lucene.net. &

[Lucene.Net] Lucene.net - first Stp

Hi! I'm newbie and have a great headache to use Lucene.net. I downloaded the \2.9.4 - Source\src\core and simply do not know how to make it work. Is there a document that explains the initial steps? I don't find(know) any good document on internet*.  Do you have one good book/sit

[Lucene.Net] Twitter account

Hi all, Just wanted to let you know that now Lucene.net has a twitter account http://twitter.com/#!/LuceneDotNet To stay up to date with what's going on, follow that account Simone --- Simone Chiaretta @simonech Sent from a tablet

[Lucene.Net] [Announcement] Lucene.net 2.9.4 nuget packages

Hi, with much pleasure I'm happy to announce that now it is possible to download the latest version of Lucene.net also from nuget. Keep in mind tho that the previous lucene.net packages were not releases by the lucene.net team, but by other people in the community, The two official package

RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

al Message- From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 Yes, thank you things are being sorted out... have very useful discussion with your (soon

Re: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

gt; -Original Message- > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 > > > What's Nuget? I kid - I'm working on

RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

I've been talking to Simone Chiaretta about this. NuGet team is happy to help. :) -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net

RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

[email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 Importance: Low Hey All, I'm happy to announce that we've released Lucene.Net 2.9.4. Check out the download page (http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download.html) to get links to the s

Re: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

te: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:50:01 +0200 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 > > > > Hi, no nuget packages were released?! > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Prescott Nasser

Re: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

Congrats to all , looking forward to finally being able to deploy the official release :) -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 8:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 What's Nuget?

RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

What's Nuget? I kid - I'm working on it - probably one more day (I've never done it before) ~P > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:50:01 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >