while ( token!=null )*
*{*
*System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(token.Term());*
*token = ts.Next();*
*}*
DIGY
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Li Bing wrote:
> According to my experiences, "3D" should not be indexed in
The reason may be the "FlushFileBuffers" in "SupportClass.FileSupport.Sync".
Can you change the code as below and try again?
public static void Sync(System.IO.FileStream fileStream)
{
if (fileStream == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("fileStream");
fileS
See previous discussions about IKVM
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.net.user/806
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.net.user/802
DIGY
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Hans Merkl wrote:
> Has anybody tried using Lucene with IKVM.NET? I haven't
It seems that the problem is not related with parsing or escaping the
string, rather choosing an inappropriate analyzer for your needs. You can
not search what you haven't indexed.
You can use below code to see what is indexed with different type of
analyzers.
DIGY
Analyzer analyzer
Again same answer.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-user/201011.mbox/%3caanlktim6kyuzhwb8p7g=hvqx6dy1fkarchro0hyw+...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Use the code and see what StandardAnalyzer does with your input string.
DIGY
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Umer Khalid Qureshi
What do you mean by "partially updating" the index. This seems to be a
XY-problem (http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=542341)
DIGY
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, K a r n a v wrote:
> I want to do partial update over lucene index (rather than doing complete
> indexing eve
Yes. Use IndexWriter's AddIndexes method.
DIGY
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Nicholas Petersen wrote:
> Is it possible to merge a number of indexes that were generated completely
> separate from each other? I have a case use where this could really be
> useful (where indexes h
There is nothing related with Lucene.Net in the stack trace.
It would be better to post your question to NHibernate maling list.
DIGY
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Christian Setzkorn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a method like this:
>
>
>
> public IList Query(stri
Yes, for all.
Lucene.Net is thread safe and you make indexing and searching at the same
time.
Just refer to Java documents to learn about indexwriter.GetReader,
indexreader.Reopen etc.
DIGY
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Edward83 wrote:
> Hello!!!
>
>
> Please tell me:
>
>
"www.worldbestwebsites.com", you can search "world", "best", "web",
"website", "bestweb" or "stwebsi" :) etc.
DIGY
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Thomas Rankin wrote:
> Hey everyone, I'm trying to figure out the best way to get lu
Working with "+" can be problematic and you may need to write your own
custom analyzer.
You can use code below to see what you are indexing and searching.
DIGY
* string Test(string docTextToIndex, string textToSearch)*
*{*
*
*
*StringBuilder sb = new Str
rves
> the
> right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from
> this e-mail
> address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
> Infosys e-mail system.
> ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
>
DIGY
Take a look at OpenBitSetDISI in Lucene.Net.Util
DIGY
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:20 AM, lars aslin wrote:
> Hi
> Im building a search function with Lucene.NET where I want faceted
> searches to be supported. To accomplish this in an efficient way I
> thought a good idea would
I prepared a sample. Maybe, this can help
http://people.apache.org/~digy/FacetedSearch.cs
DIGY
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:43 AM, K a r n a v wrote:
> I've tried with OpenBitSetDISI...its not a performance effective one
> but
> able generate results with BitArr
List categories = new List();
TermEnum te = reader.Terms(new Term("cat",""));
categories.Add(te.Term().Text());
while (te.Next())
{
if (te.Term().Field() != "cat") break;
categories.Add(te.Term().Text());
"not analyzed", you can also try to use TermQuery while
searching.
DIGY
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:36 PM, K a r n a v wrote:
> How can we handle special characters like .;: / \?"\<>~`*!@#$%^&-_+={}[]|(
> When I search with hyderabad-india...internally it is removing
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415
DIGY
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Marco Dissel wrote:
> Can you share your implementation (if it's generic)
>
> Thanks
> Op 23 mei 2011 11:47 schreef "lars aslin" het
> volgende:
> > Thanks Digg
I still don't understand, since these numbers can easily be obtained from
current implementation.
Just count HitsPerGroup.Name[i]' s.
DIGY
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Marco Dissel wrote:
> Let's take the sample data from http://goo.gl/UQubj
>
>
Indeed, I seems to be slow. With 30 facets, ~300K docs and 1.4GB index I get
better results.(first query: ~100-400 ms, if I repeat it then <10ms)
Do you use the code from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_9_4g/src/contrib/SimpleFacetedSearch/
?
DIGY
Creation of SimplefacetedSearch is slow. Therefore it should only be created
when a new reader is opened (or reopened).
DIGY
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Marco Dissel wrote:
> Our index contains documents with an unique ID (long number) corresponding
> to a record in SQL database.
When term count in query increases, search time increases also. Therefore,
if possible, use precomputed BitSets and "AND" it with user's query. Another
costly operation is the fectching data from the index. Limiting the result
count to smaller numbers may help too.
DIGY
On Fri,
Suppose every field contains 20 unique terms, then you have 64,000,000
combinations to compute in constructor.
(I think, SFS finds only 949 of them usable(BitSets with >0 cardinality)).
DIGY
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Marco Dissel wrote:
> If I increase my number of facetfields to
I create the SFS only once and use two fields for faceting(added one more
field after my eMail with 30 & 11 unique terms).
That is all.
DIGY
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Marco Dissel wrote:
> Correct, but why do you get much better performance, according to a
> previous
> ema
ons" of faceted search in contrib.
DIGY
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created a new github repository where I'm dumping all extensions I write
> or port from Java myself. The intention is having a community based
> repositor
Hi Itamar,
Can you send a simple self-contained test case showing the bug?
DIGY
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently discovered another memory leak within Lucene.NET, that is
> related to LUCENENET-358 (CloseableThreadLocal me
> Does this include your changes to ClosableThreadLocal?
No, the old implementation.
DIGY
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> Does this include your changes to ClosableThreadLocal?
>
> Also, you probably won't see a memory leak in this fashion. We only s
That may help
UnaccentedWordAnalyzer @
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/contrib/Core/Analysis/Ext/Analysis.Ext.cs
DIGY
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Floyd Wu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a question that annoying me many times. my situation is th
- Just copy and paste to your project :) and use it instead of
StandardAnalyzer .
- Yes, it is from 2.9.4.
DIGY
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Floyd Wu wrote:
> Hi Digy,
>
> Thank you. But how to apply this to my current project? Is this compitable
> with lucene.net-2.9.
There must be something wrong. I can index 18,000,000 docs in ~20 mins :)
DIGY
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Floyd Wu wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm doing a little test to find out what is the better implementation
> for my situation.
>
> I'm indexing 18,000 docs and
lmost ready.
"NIOFSDirectory" and "MmapDirectory" may be problematic(as you hit one of
them). If you avoid using them, I don't think that you will face with a
problem.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: nima dilmaghani [mailto:nim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, Decemb
I don't think that there will be a measurable performance difference in
using HashTable or string[].
Just to remind, StandardAnalyzer constructors that accept string[] for
stopwords are deprecated and will be removed with 3.0.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: T. R. Halvorson [mai
have an open IndexReader , IndexWriter is not going to delete the
necessary files till no one uses it. Maybe, "IndexReader.IsCurrent" can
solve your problem.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pennal [mailto:je...@openroad.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:42
As Michael stated, I prefer also not hosting "indexing and searching
sevices" in IIS.
There are many alternatives such as WCF, Remoting etc. With a separate
service for Lucene, you can control anything you want.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspa
"(instead it is subclass of
MultiTermQueryWrapperFilter).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:39 PM
To: lucene-net-user
Subject: Re: Possible memory leak in Lucene.NET 2.4?
I'm having a look at the
The formal way is throwing exception in the HitCollector.Collect to stop
iteration.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.cherei...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:16 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
I also have thought many times why HitCollector.Collect doesn't return a
boolean value indicating no more results are needed.
Maybe, a small performance increment.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Thursday, Janua
uot;.
The problem arises if you have a millions of results: You have to iterate
all over the results although you want to have top MaxDox# docs.
The real performance problem is, which one is better:
an empty iteration of millions of times or an exception (say at 100 or 500)?
DIGY
You can use TermEnum to find the min. value since terms are stored *sorted* in
the index.
But finding max. may not be so easy. Storing these values in a control doc(such
as doc{ fieldMinValue:m ; fieldMaxValue:n} ) or at an external location (while
indexing) may be a solution.
DIGY
Hi Luis,
Why do you post the same question twice? Please read previous answers.
Here is a code that may give you a hint
private void Form2_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
IndexInt();
FindMinAndMax();
}
L
Is this a joke?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-user/201001.mbox/date?1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Luis Fco. Ramriez Daza Glez [mailto:luis.francisco@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:29 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How
Which version of Lucene.Net are you using?
Is it possible that you're not closing the IndexWriter before opening a new
one and two open IndexWriters accidentally share the same index? (such as
using IndexWriter.Unlock etc.).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Li Bing [mailto:lbl...@gmai
2.0 is really old. I am pretty sure you won't get this error with a
newer(2.3.2, 2.4.0, 2.9.1) version.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/lucene.net/
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Li Bing [mailto:lbl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 2:11 AM
To: lucene-net
Nice Bug:-) Can you open a JIRA issue for that?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Moray McConnachie [mailto:mmcco...@oxford-analytica.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:19 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Bug on query serialization between 2.3 and current trunk
ecessary permissions).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Tim Haughton [mailto:timhaugh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:31 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unauthorized Exception Error
Some more relevant info:
Version: Dev version Exception Date: 30 January
Have you read http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-106 ?
DIGY
From: Billy Ho [mailto:bill...@jobsdb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:17 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Attempt fix of memory leak at FieldCacheImpl of Lucene.Net 2.1.0
Hi,
We have
> DIGY's patch to provide a functional equivalent of Java's WeakHashTable is
> currently in the trunk, and is in all versions after the 2.3.1 tag in SVN.
It was a good collaborative work of many people. But the Oscar goes to Eyal
Post for the final version of WeakHashTable.
DIG
Hi Simone,
Can you try to open/create a file in that directory within your app(without
using Lucene.NET) to narrow down the source of the problem.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:46 PM
To: lucene
You can try Similarity.Net. it is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/lucene.net/trunk/C#/contrib/Similari
ty.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Caputo [mailto:giovannicaput...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:54 PM
To: lucene-net-user
We don't still have any feedback about your medium-trust problem. Did it
work?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:13 PM
To: lucene-net-user
Subject: Series of post about Lucene.net (and how Lucene.ne
rmance).
Second, Lucene.Net does not have a built-in support for zipped index. So,
you have to develop your own "ZippedDirectory" class.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Schuler [mailto:andrew.schu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 11:48 PM
To: lucene-net-user@luce
Hi Nick,
Suppose that I have 1G file with a compressed size of 100M and I want to
read just a 4K block from offset 900M.
Considering the SharpZip Lib,DotNetZip or similars , would be the cost more
CPU and less IO? Or more CPU more IO?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET
ek request is made,
you have to unzip whole file at the beginning, and use that in your app.
But this is not what I understand from Andrew's statement
"Does any one have experience running an index directly out of zip file?"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Nichola
r own
storage on disk.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Schuler [mailto:andrew.schu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 9:47 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene index file container
Yes, that is do-able. I was just thinking it would be cleaner to
As you said, It seems like an open IndexReader blocking the IndexWriter. Can
you try to open IndexReader as readonly or better use
IndexWriter.GetIndexReader.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Luis Fco. Ramriez Daza Glez [mailto:luisfc...@yahoo.com.mx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6
> Architectural changes mean that this query generation code no longer has
access to an IndexReader and can only use a Searcher
Why? IndexSearcher has a method "GetIndexReader" (or possibly, I couldn't
understand the problem)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Alex Davidson
and pass to SetInfoStream.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Luis Fco. Ramriez Daza Glez [mailto:luisfc...@yahoo.com.mx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:05 AM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Commit / Optimize taking too long.
Hi all
We have a problem with some of our prog
No. :-(
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Luis Fco. Ramriez Daza Glez [mailto:luisfc...@yahoo.com.mx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Commit / Optimize taking too long.
Hi Digy
Thanks, that’s what I had t do.
Also I don’t think
=false" to be able to see the newly added docs,
indexWriter can commit the changes.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Luis Fco Ramirez Daza Glez [mailto:luis.francisco@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 10:08 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Commit
Is it possible that you are VB.Net user and didn't include C# while
installing Visual Studio?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: rafia qutab [mailto:rafiama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:03 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Setting up lucene.net
Hi,
Maybe that can help;
queryParser.SetMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_R
EWRITE);
query=queryParser.Parse(...);
query.Rewrite(indexReader).ToString();
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3
I've always found it easier to index the data as string whenever possible.
Same as the numeric data; I mostly pad them with '0's and index as text.
At the end, Lucene is a full-"text" search engine.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar.
:Ford")),
While iterating through the results pass "query for highlight" to FVH.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Mike Prager [mailto:m...@tripartum.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 1:04 AM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: hit Highlighting and Mutli Term Search
H
Concatenating name and surname (and then lowercasing) with a custom analyzer?
like johnlennon ringostar paulmccartney georgeharrison
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:09 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
issue for this.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Ferreira [mailto:pfferre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:22 AM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: IndexReader.LastModified giving invalid date?
Hi there,
I am moving an app over from using Lucene 2.0, to Lucene
1- Please subscribe to mailing list to post messages.
2- You are right, LuceneDictionary should be fixed as you suggested.
3- Please go to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET, signup and
create a new JIRA issue describing this bug.
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
No. But you can use IFilter interface to convert any registered app's format
to text. For ex, if you have MS Office installed, than this means, you
already have word2text, excel2text etc. convertors.
See http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/IFilter.aspx
DIGY
-Original Message-
want deal with all sort of
file formats and write some highlighter code for each of them) to highlight
the original document.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:03 AM
To: lucene-net-user
Subject: Re: Are there any analyzer
Just use a single IndexReader in all threads. No need for lock or other
types of sync. primitives.
(true since > 2.3.2 but better use 2.9.2 in trunk)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: emagdnim paradox [mailto:bwsithspaw...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 8:54 PM
To: lucene-net-u
();
}
}
//Called by different threads. No "lock" is needed!
void Search()
{
IndexSearcher src = new IndexSearcher(
singletonIndexWriter.GetReader() );
//search
src.Close();
}
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: emagdnim paradox [mailto:bwsithspaw...@yahoo.
to "reopen".
Besides that, don't optimize the index at all, you won't lose anything
remarkable in terms of performance because of changes in internals of
Lucene 2.9.X such as "per segment readers".
PS: Using single instances of IndexWriter/IndexReader are safe
Hi Nima,
Your code runs fine. No exception.
DIGY
PS: I used Lucene.Net 2.9.2
-Original Message-
From: nima dilmaghani [mailto:nim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 8:46 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: FileNotFoundException thrown when I expected Lucene.NET
You can use wildcard searches but they are slow. If I were you, I would
write a custom analyzer to separate tokens as [uche] and [8861].
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: EZEILO,UCHENNA JEREMIAH [mailto:ueze...@cenbank.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 6:26 PM
To: lucene-net-user
cene/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/contrib/Contri
b.Net/Contrib.Net/Analysis/Ext/Analysis.Ext.cs
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: emagdnim paradox [mailto:bwsithspaw...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:03 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: phrase filter
Hey all,
When I
I am not sure that I understand your need well. But why don't you just
shuffle the search results?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: nima dilmaghani [mailto:nim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:40 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: shuffle or randomize m
I don't know much about highlighter.
Have you tried FastvectorHighlighter? it can give you more correct results
related with phrase query.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:31 PM
To: lucene-net-user
Subject: Highli
Have you tried "CustomScoreQuery"?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:57 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Weighing relevance vs confidence
So
Hi Nenad,
To get 3 matches, you should have indexed 3 documents(either same docs. in
the index or 3 docs each having one field). Otherwise it should have worked
as you expected.
For the second part, other that boosting "keyword", I don't think that you
have to do somethi
See "MoreLikeThisQuery" in "Contrib/Queries.Net".
It does what you are seeking for.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Pohl [mailto:robba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:18 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Find articles I like
child1"
Doc4 : Category="Root Child1 Grandchild2"
Doc5 : Category="Root Child2"
Doc6 : Category="Root Child2 Grandchild3"
Doc7 : Category="Root Child2 Grandchild4"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneyc..
Thanks Bernie,
This patch is lost while working on 2.9.0 port.
I recommitted that patch. (for 2.9.1 & 2.9.2 in trunk)
and added also a test case(A small variation of your C# code) not to lose
that again.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Bernie Solomon [mailto:bjsj...@roadrunner.com]
>>>>> return input.Next();
How can you can be sure that input.Next() is not a one-char token?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Markus Doerig [mailto:farang...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:43 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Unwanted Tokens
For input "This is a b text", your code would output [this] [is] [b] [text].
Call "return this.Next()" instead of "return input.Next()"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Markus Doerig [mailto:farang...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:43 PM
To: luc
I updated the title of LUCENENET-357
Attaching your patch to that issue would be good.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:54 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.net in Medium Trust
Because you recreate(purge) the index.
New IndexWriter(indexDir, New Standard.StandardAnalyzer(), >>>> True
<<<<)
Last Boolean parameter can be something like "Not
System.IO.Directory.Exists(indexDir)"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Bob Eastbro
r.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS) ); //<-- Field used in highlighting
with a query something like [f1:abc OR f2:abc], you would get a hit but no
highlight.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Midhat Ali [mailto:midhat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:03 PM
To: lucene-net-user
Subject:
Below is what I can create from your messy data. It works as expected and
returns "The Company has noth".
DIGY
Lucene.Net.Store.RAMDirectory DIR = new
Lucene.Net.Store.RAMDirectory();
IndexWriter wr = new IndexWriter(DIR, new Standa
One more thing,
What is "i". Is it index of a loop or docID?
fvHighlighter.GetBestFragment(fvHighlighter.GetFieldQuery(query),searcher.Ge
tIndexReader(), i, "FullContent", 20);
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Midhat Ali [mailto:midhat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mo
I close it
only when the application terminates).
* I never optimize the Index.
* With every search request, I invoke "IndexWriter.GetReader", make the
search, and close the reader.
* I use Lucene.Net 2.9.2
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Josh Handel [mailto:josh.han...@catapults
Then, you should think of using Query.Rewrite for your queries.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: TJ Kolev [mailto:tjko...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:41 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighter and ConstantScoreQuery don't play together
I a
ing stuff is handled internally.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Josh Handel [mailto:josh.han...@catapultsystems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:52 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: IndexWriter holding on to files?
I'm pretty sure (IE watched it many many times i
QueryParser always use analyzers. To search in fields that are not analyzed,
use TermQuery.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Josh Handel [mailto:josh.han...@catapultsystems.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:05 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: QueryParser
If you are
Hi Simone,
Unmanaged flush is the direct port of java. I think using only the managed
one would be enough.
(There were discussions about that in the past, you can find them with some
googling.)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent
Try to use "commit" (for ex, at every 10000 docs)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Josh Handel [mailto:josh.han...@catapultsystems.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 9:57 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Big data Suggestions. (Out of Memory)
I hate to ping multipl
In 2.4.0 we only used managed flush code and I never saw a bug.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:15 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Still a problem with medium trust: unmanaged code
So
Hi Simone,
Since you will get a SecurityException everytime sync is called in medium
trust, why don't you just comment out that code.
If I were 100% sure, I would do the same for the Lucene.Net core.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmai
No, It is not about mono. My hesitation is:
If a managed process crashes after it's called filestream.Flush(), can we
know for sure that all the data will eventually be written to disk.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:simone.chiare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday
it
yesterday)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Josh Handel [mailto:josh.han...@catapultsystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:55 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Big data Suggestions. (Out of Memory)
Set the commit to every 1000 documents and changed to just 1
It is an expected behaviour. Score can be any number .GT. 0 and isn't
normalized(although it mostly falls into [0-1] range).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christian Klauß [mailto:s8788...@inf.tu-dresden.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:42 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apach
Killing a process without closing the IndexWriter may leave lock-files
behind. You can use the static method "IndexWriter.Unlock" to forcibly
unlock the index.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Adam smalin [mailto:acidzombi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:29 PM
To:
ader.Document(td.Doc());
..
}
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.cherei...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:02 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: querying for certain document term frequency
Hi,
I'm l
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
