Hi there. I've got an index of company names, and it's split up into
separate indexes by state.
I have a simple command line interface for testing. I'm getting some odd
results, though, with certain logic of wildcard searches. It seems like
depending on what order I put the fields of the query
You can also use a RangeQuery. If you index the field of numeric data, say
'score', as a string, then you can do things like: score:[75 TO 80]. Only
extra work is that you need to pad the actual score with enough 0's (such
that 9 becomes 09, etc.) to cover the expected range.
Regards,
Terry
--
Yeah, I was using HTMLParser for a few days until I tried to parse a 400K
document and it spun at 100% CPU for a very long time. It is tolerant of
bad HTML, but does not appear to scale. TagSoup processed the same
document in a second or less at <25% CPU.
-Mike
At 02:42 PM 9/22/2003 +0200, y
Good work, Erik.
Hui
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 4:13 AM
Subject: per-field Analyzer (was Re: some requests)
> On Friday, September 19, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Erik Hatcher wrot
Yes, you can do numeric searches as long as you realize its really just
text that is indexed. You will need to ensure the Analyzer you use
indexes numbers appropriately as well.
Erik
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 02:06 AM, Senthil Kumar K wrote:
Hi,
I found that lucene is a full-feat
Michael Giles wrote:
Erik,
Probably a good idea to swap something else in, although Neko introduces
a dependency on Xerces. I didn't play with Neko because I am currently
using a different XML parser and didn't want to deal with the conflicts
(and also find dependencies on specific parsers ann
Hi,
I have to develop a distributed search engine for my company. I’m very
interested with the Lucene index format, and I want to use it. The main
problem is how to distribute the index in the different machines.
The solution is not just copy the index, because I have to manage 50Gb
of data. I
