-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP An error
occurred at line: 36 in the jsp file: /web/results.jsp Generated servlet
error: [javac] Compiling 1 source file [javac]
Hi,
From
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/queryparsersyntax.html
The OR operator is the default conjunction operator. This means that
if there is no Boolean operator between two terms, the OR operator is
used.
So foo bar is equivalent to foo OR bar and will
Can you elaborate on you don't compile directory using Lucene?
These are the steps I took:
1) I compile all the files in a particular directory using the command:
java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexHTML -create -index c:\\index ..
, putting all the indexed files in c:\\index.
2) Everytime, I
1) I compile all the files in a particular directory using the command:
java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexHTML -create -index c:\\index ..
, putting all the indexed files in c:\\index.
2) Everytime, I added an additional file in that directory. I need to
reindex/recompile that directory to
There is an attribute in QueryParser that will let you set AND as the
default operator.
victor
- Original Message -
From: Dror Matalon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:33 PM
Subject: StandardAnalyzer defaults to OR on query
Hello,
I have the following problem: in my application I'm trying to store set
of keywords and their weights. Since the number of keywords is variable
(and can be as high as 40) I decided to use a single field to store it.
In other words, I want to use a single field with multiple values to
Sorry, no firm date. However, 1.3 RC2 is pretty solid, so I suggest
you just use that until 1.3 final is out.
Otis
--- Tun Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows when the full version of Lucene version 1.3 will be
released?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Erik -
Spot on. I should have listened to your advice from the talk and just used MMDD :)
Everything works nicely now that I do the conversion.
Thanks for the great ideas.
Dion
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003
Hi,
I am a very beginner of Lucene und started to look into some articles and
the API documentation. I know the theories behind Information Retrieval and
want to find out about Lucene. I think it is the best Java API IR package
available nowadays.
One question:
The similarity class is abstract.
It sounds like you missed this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/DefaultSimilarity.html
You can write your own implementations and use it during indexing and
searching.
Otis
--- Ralf B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a very beginner of Lucene und
Is there a url that will take me to the javadocs for Lucene 1.2, rather than 1.3-rc2?
thanks,
--David
- Original Message -
From: Dion Almaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:07 am
Subject: RE: Dates and others
Erik -
Spot on. I should have listened to your advice
On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 12:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a url that will take me to the javadocs for Lucene 1.2,
rather than 1.3-rc2?
No, but the 1.2 binary distribution ships with the javadocs, I believe.
And, of course, they would be easy to generate from the 1.2 source
On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 12:22 PM, Ralf B wrote:
One question:
The similarity class is abstract. Are there default implementations
like in
other parts of this API (Analysers for example) available and how can
I use
it i.e. to calculate weights? Are there some default implementations
Hi,
I'm using the Multi Field Search to search all the fields of my
documents during the search.
When it returns results the scores are numerically low - .06, .17, etc.
I would think if I searched for Dog and there was a doc with Dog in
the title and several times in the contents of a document
I see
setOperator(DEFAULT_OPERATOR_AND);
Maybe the docs should be changed not to say
The only method that clients should need to call is parse().
Thanks for the pointer,
Dror
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:14:12PM +1100, Victor Hadianto wrote:
There is an attribute in QueryParser that will let
Erik,
On Sunday 23 November 2003 12:51, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Saturday, November 22, 2003, at 06:33 PM, Dion Almaer wrote:
3. I have some fields suck as title, owner, etc as well as the content
blob which I index and use as
the default search field. Is there an easy way to extend the
If you had to be production in January, would you be using 1.3RC2 or 1.2?
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:03 AM
To: Lucene Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lucene version 1.3.
Sorry, no firm date. However,
Tracey --
it would help if you could give more detail on the types of documents,
fields and analyzers you're using. Also what do you mean by Multi Field
Search? I presume you're using the MultiFieldQueryParser to have query
terms in a user-submitted query be searched for in each field in your
Dear Victor:
I applied the changed based on the patch. Also, I got t-shirt in the search query.
I rebuilt the search index using the modified lucene-1.3-rc2.jar and did the search by
the modified jar as well.
The search field was specified as indexed, tokenized and stored.
When I do the
I'm using 1.3RC2 in production right now.
Francesco
Scott Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you had to be production in January, would you be using 1.3RC2 or
1.2?
-
Francesco Bellomi
Use truth to show illusion,
and illusion to show truth.
Tun Lin wrote:
These are the steps I took:
1) I compile all the files in a particular directory using the command:
java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexHTML -create -index c:\\index ..
, putting all the indexed files in c:\\index.
2) Everytime, I added an additional file in that directory. I need
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Now, I'm wondering how do I encode the weight of keywords... If I do the
following:
Field f = Field.Keyword(kw, value1);
f.setBoost(10.0);
doc.add(f);
f = Field.Keyword(kw, value2);
f.setBoost(20.0);
doc.add(f);
Now the question is: what is the boost value for the fields
I'm having difficulty creating an IndexSearcher from an FSDirectory in 1.3-rc2. The
code is as follows (log.writeToLog is a convenience method):
log.writeToLog(Log.DEBUG,directory path =+hitPath);
File f = new File(hitPath);
log.writeToLog(Log.DEBUG,file exists = +String.valueOf(f.exists()));
resolved...it was the new feature that writes locks to java.io.tmpdir, which in my
servlet engine was interpreted as $CATALINA_HOME/temp, which didn't exist.
--D
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:30 pm
Subject: permissions or lock problem?
Odd ...
This is working fine for us. You have to use the patched Lucene to both
build and do the search and to make sure to use the same analyser. Failing
that, email me the code that you use to build/search the index and I'll have
a look.
HTH,
victor
- Original Message -
From:
Dear Victor:
Finally, I got search results. I made a mistake to create index files.
Thanks a lot
Jianshuo
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:24:23 +1100, Victor Hadianto wrote:
Odd ...
This is working fine for us. You have to use the patched Lucene to both
build and do the search and to make sure
I am now using 1.3RC2.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:04 AM
To: 'Lucene Users List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Lucene version 1.3.
If you had to be production in January, would you be using 1.3RC2 or 1.2?
Will the final version 1.3 include an application that does the incremental
updates automatically?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:01 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene refresh index function (incremental
Does it support indexing the contents of pdf files? I have found one project
called PDFBox that can be integrated with Lucene to search inside of the pdf
files. Currently, Lucene can only search for the pdf filename. I tried with
PDFBox and I got the following message when I typed the command:
29 matches
Mail list logo
