Hi,
I have a field named bidcode in my Index,the value is like this:
Doc1:;
Doc2:;a0213;a0245
Doc3:;
Doc4:;
Doc5:;a2148;a0214
how can I search all the documents that the value of this field is ;?
I use the Query like this:
Query query = QueryParser.parse(bidcode:\;\,
Hello,
I would like to provide an alternative query syntax for ranges by using
a colon (':') or two dots ('..') instead of ' TO '.
For example:
mod_date:[20020101:20030101]
Or
mod_date:[20020101..20030101]
What would be the correct procedure to modify the QueryParser to
achieve this? Should I
JPhD, you have to add the _JAR_ (lucene-1.4.1-final.jar probably) to
your CLASSPATH. You may also have to add the demo Jar to the
CLASSPATH.
Otis
--- J.Ph DEGLETAGNE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I want test lucene,
My configuration : Windows XP...
First, I have
Are you using pre-1.4.1 version of Lucene? There was a bug in one of
the older versions that left multiple, old index files around, instead
of deleting them. Maybe that's using up the disk space. Give us your
index directory's 'ls -al' or 'dir'.
Otis
--- Niraj Alok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
Apologies...
Just was Curious to know
If Lucene-1.4.1-final.jar a minor version change of Lucene1-4-final.jar
or
;{
Thx in Advance
WITH WARM REGARDS
HAVE A NICE DAY
[ N.S.KARTHIK]
Which Analyzer did you use for indexing, and which one are you using
for searching? You have to make sure that neither of them discards
that ; character.
Use Luke to double-check that fields in your index still have that ;
character, and then make sure that the Analyzer you are passing to
Yes. Minor bug fix, minor version. See the lnk to CHANGES.txt file on
Lucene's home page.
Otis
P.S.
No need to apologize :)
--- Karthik N S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
Apologies...
Just was Curious to know
If Lucene-1.4.1-final.jar a minor version change
I'm not on very friendly terms with JavaCC either, but I think what you
are saying is correct - it looks like lines 519 and 526 (the ones that
define 'TO') are the ones to change, in Lucene CVS HEAD.
Otis
--- petite_abeille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to provide an
Hi Otis,
Here is the dir results: ( I am using 1.3 final)
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 3767-CD49
Directory of
C:\eclipse\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.19\webapps\HCPF\WEB-INF\classes\indexall
23/08/2004 10:50DIR .
23/08/2004 10:50DIR ..
21/08/2004
This looks optimized and healthy. You also have a large number of
fields, and it looks like a lot (all?) of them are stored and indexed.
That's what that large .fdt file indicated. That file is 206 MB in
size. Have you looked into your index to make sure you don't have
duplicate Documents in
On Aug 31, 2004, at 17:17, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You also have a large number of
fields, and it looks like a lot (all?) of them are stored and indexed.
That's what that large .fdt file indicated. That file is 206 MB in
size.
Try using Field.UnStored() to avoid storing all those data in your
Hello Somebody,
..I beg your pardon...
Under Windows XP / TomCat,
How to customize Webapp Lucene to access directory filesystem which are
outside TomCat ?
like this :
D:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\..
to access
E:\Data
Thank's a lot
JPhD
i have a web application using lucene via tomcat,
you may need to set
the correct permissions in ur catalina.policy file
i use a blanket policy of
grant {
permission java.io.FilePermission /,read;
};
to manage allow access to lucene
-Original Message-
From: J.Ph
FYI
I was able to find Lucene 1.4.1 here:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/lucene/v1.4.1/
But if I go here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
1.4 is the only lucene download option available.
Dan
-
To
Thanks for reporting this. We actually know. Lucene 1.4.1 was not
released properly, and it is going to require someone to do so.
I've done the last two releases, but have been swamped lately. If no
one beats me to it, I'll hopefully get around to this in the near
future.
Erik
On
Hi
Im having some troble using Lucene - but is the .NET port. Should I ask questions
about the different analyzers and tokenizers on this mailinglist or one some other?
Also - does anyone know the difference between the to .NET implementations listed on
the Lucene website?
I was also thinking on the same lines.
Actually the original code was written by some one else who has left and so
I have to own this.
At almost all the places, it is Field.Text and at some few places its
Field.UnIndexed.
I looked at the javadocs and found that there is Field.UnStored also.
The
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Niraj Alok wrote
I was also thinking on the same lines.
Actually the original code was written by some one else who has left and so
I have to own this.
At almost all the places, it is Field.Text and at some few places its
Field.UnIndexed.
I looked at the javadocs and
18 matches
Mail list logo
