Bill Janssen wrote:
Thanks to Bill Tschumy, who points out that Lucene 1.4.21 *breaks* the
API exported by 1.4 by removing a parameter from
QueryParser.getFieldQuery(). That means that my
NewMultiFieldQueryParser also breaks, since it overrides that method.
To fix, just remove the Analyzer
On Nov 2, 2004, at 11:15 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
If the Search Word 'kid' is suppose to return me kid ,
kid's ,
kidoos, children
1) Do I need to use Combination of more then one Analysers ???
, If
so How.
2) Any Alternate modification to be done for the simple Searcher
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 2. November 2004 09:21
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: jaspq: dashed numerical values tokenized differently
Daniel Taurat writes:
Hi,
I have just another stupid parser question:
There seems to be a
On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:03 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Query parser was changed to treat '-' within words as part of the
word.
Before that change a query 'dash-test' was parsed as 'dash AND NOT
test'.
Now QP reads one word 'dash-test' which is analyzed. If the analyzer
splits that to more than one
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 13:39
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: jaspq: dashed numerical values tokenized differently
On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:03 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Query parser was changed to treat
On Nov 3, 2004, at 8:51 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Now my only question is, why the tokenizing works differently for
strings with numerical components, or if there is a way to make the
standardAnalyzer treat those dashed mixed-characters strings similar to
plain letter-strings.
Give me an example of
Hi,
(First of all : what is the plurial of index in english ; indexes or indices ?)
I want to search into several indexes (indices ?).
For that, I parse a new query using QueryParser or MultiFieldQueryParser.
Then I search my indexes using the MultiSearcher class.
Ok, but the problem comes
Give me an example of a string and how you'd like it to be tokenized.
But first, give the AnalyzerUtils (from my java.net article) a try and
get a feel for what different analyzers do.
Keep in mind that it can be tricky (see the AnalysisParalysis page on
the wiki and my java.net article
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Checked with Luke on the string
dash\-123\-01
and got
dash
123
01
with germanAnalyzer and standardAnalyzer
and
dash
with all the other, except for whitespaceAnalyser, of course.
This makes me think that an escaped dash is never a minus, somehow.
No
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dr. Daniel Taurat
Senior Consultant
VIP ENTERPRISE 8 | THE POWER OF CONTENT AT WORK
Gauss Interprise AG Phone:
1) Open index with IndexReader.open()
2) Check that (for example) numDocs = 10, hasDeletions = false
3) Delete one document
4) Close IndexReader with IndexReader.close()
5) Open index with IndexReader.open()
6) Check that (for example) numDocs = 9, hasDeletions = true
7) Iterate with
Besides full text indexing, I need a database that represent a large
dictionary like:
(key1, key2) - docid
I am considering between building a home grown solution and using
Berkeley DB. Then I think I was using Lucene anyway, wouldn't it make
sense use it as my database too? Just make key1 and
Did anyone tried this class ?
I tried this class but I can't make it to work I indexed a field as new
Field(description, description,true,true,true,true); but when I call
TokenSources.getTokenStream(_indexReader,i,description); I get
ClassCastException
In this class the line TermPositionVector
Hi all,
where can i find the servlet for the searchbean
classes?
thé directory on cvs is now empty
ciao
miro
___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden:
I developeda
Filter that restricts search results to documents that has terms in specific
fields
(because currently we can't search with
lucene documents with this kind of feature (a document with present/absent of
values in specific fields)
nicolas
package org.apache.lucene.search;
I mailed on this a while back, but am still at a loss.
Has anyone had any luck using lucene's built in sort functions to sort
first by the lucene hit score and secondarily by a Field in each
document indexed as Keyword and in integer form?
I can only get it to sort by one or the other... but
As far as I know, there was no servlet that came with SearchBean.
SearchBean is basically deprecated at this point - the new sorting
features do sorting much nicer.
SearchBean is still in the jakarta-lucene-sandbox CVS under
contributions/searchbean directory.
Erik
On Nov 3, 2004, at
17 matches
Mail list logo
