Hi all,
I'm using Lucene to index XML document/ file (may be millions of documents in
future, each about 5-10KB)
Beside the index for searching, I want to use Lucene to store whole document
content with UnIndexed fields -content field(instead of store each document in
a XML file). All the
Hi,
Thank you for help.
I got solution for this. lucene 1.3 index works with clucene 0.8.12
- Original Message -
From: Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: Need Help
Hello,
You should
Hi All,
Can i search only one word in a keyword field which contains few words.
I know keyword field isn't tokenized. After many tests, i think is
impossible.
Someone can confirm me ?
Why don't i use a text field? because the users know the category from a
list (ex: category ABC, category DEF
You can add the category keyword multiple times to a document.
Instead of seperating your categories with a delimiter, just add the
keyword multiple times.
doc.add(Field.Keyword(category, ABC);
doc.add(Field.Keyword(category, DEF GHI);
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:18:19 +0100, Thierry Ferrero
It is difficult to give a general answer. You can certainly store the
whole XML in the Lucene index, just don't tokenize it. The HEAD
version of Lucene even has some compression that you may find handy.
On the other hand, storing XML in the FS would allow you to store XML
files wherever you
Hi,
I've implemented a converter to translate our system's internal Query
objects to Lucene's Query model.
I recently realized that my implementation of OR NOT was not working
as I would expect and I was wondering if anyone on this list could give
me some advice.
I am converting a query that
On Nov 9, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Luke Francl wrote:
I recently realized that my implementation of OR NOT was not working
as I would expect and I was wondering if anyone on this list could give
me some advice.
Lucene's BooleanQuery does not really have the concept of OR NOT. It's
really an AND NOT.
I
Is it possible to modify the lucene source to create an
updateDocument(doc#, FIELD, value) function ?
I know there's a lot of work that goes on being the scene when an
.add(doc) is called, but can some of that functionality be adapter to
make the update a reality?
-Chris
Luke,
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 20:58, you wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented a converter to translate our system's internal Query
objects to Lucene's Query model.
I recently realized that my implementation of OR NOT was not working
as I would expect and I was wondering if anyone on this list
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:48, Erik Hatcher wrote:
This last query has a required clause, which is what BooleanQuery
requires when there is a NOT clause. You're getting what you want here
because you've got an item_type:xyz clause as required. In your first
example, you're requiring
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:00, Paul Elschot wrote:
Lucene has no provision for matching by being prohibited only. This can
be achieved by indexing something for each document that can be
used in queries to match always, combined with something prohibited
in a query.
But doing this is bad for
Chris,
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 22:54, Chris Fraschetti wrote:
Is it possible to modify the lucene source to create an
updateDocument(doc#, FIELD, value) function ?
It's possible, but an implementation would not be efficient
when the field is indexed. The current index structure
has
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23:14, Luke Francl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:00, Paul Elschot wrote:
Lucene has no provision for matching by being prohibited only. This can
be achieved by indexing something for each document that can be
used in queries to match always, combined with
Kevin,
Sorry for the delay in replying. I think your idea for an external field
storage mechanism is excellent. I'd love to see it, and if I can, will be
willing to help make that happen.
Regards,
Terry
- Original Message -
From: Kevin A. Burton
To: Lucene Users List
Hi guys,
Apologies...
Has any one on the form attempted to retrieved data and Indexed
Macromedia FLASH based Files
If there is some example please distrubute ,it may be usefull for
developer's.
Thx in advance
WITH WARM REGARDS
HAVE A NICE DAY
[
Hi
Guys
Apologies..
History
Ist type : 4 subindexes + MultiSearcher + Search on Content Field
Only for 2000 hits
=
Exception [ Too many Files Open ]
IInd type : 40 Mergerd Indexes [1000
There is a memory leak in the sorting code of Lucene 1.4.1.
1.4.2 has the fix!
--- Karthik N S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Guys
Apologies..
History
Ist type : 4 subindexes + MultiSearcher + Search on
Content Field
Only for 2000 hits
Otis or Erik, do you know if a Reader continously opening should cause the
Writer to fail with a Lock obtain timed out error?
--- Lucene Users List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached Java file shows a locking
issue that occurs with
Lucene.
One thread opens and closes an IndexReader.
18 matches
Mail list logo