On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
yes ...it's the same kind of feature... (i didn't see this Filter !,
shame on me)
but my method is maybe faster because with the queryFilter an internal
search is launched and not with my method
It'd be interesting for you to compare the speed
QueryFilter keys off the hits from a previous search to light up the
bits for documents to pass the filter. The previous search hits all
have a score > 0 already, so no need to be concerned with score there.
Erik
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:49 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
hmm just a quest
hmm just a question ..
- in the normal indexSearcher method
there is a if (score >0.0F || filter.get(doc)) { doc in the hit}
- but in the queryFilter , there isn't a minimum score condition
normal or not ?
nicolas
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:34:00 +0100, Nicolas Maisonneuve
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
yes ...it's the same kind of feature... (i didn't see this Filter !,
shame on me)
but my method is maybe faster because with the queryFilter an internal
search is launched and not with my method
nicolas
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:06:12 -0500, Erik Hatcher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicolas - how
Nicolas - how does your filter differ from the capabilities available
from the built-in QueryFilter? It seems at first glance to be nearly
the same thing.
Erik
On Nov 21, 2004, at 4:52 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
I developped a filter to seach in filtering the search with anterior
hi
