ED]> wrote:
>
> Jason,
>
> Thanks for the info. I'll try it.
>
> Do you know if the change you describe has any impact on existing queries
> (other than to support negative boosting, if that's specified)? In other
> words, if I apply this change to existing
Hi Terry,
I know this is an old message on the list but it does not look like
anyone responded to your request. I had to do negative boosting for my
search functionality as well so I'd like to share the modification to
QueryParser.jj to make it work. Find your TOKEN and change it
to:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Terry Steichen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. September 2003 16:05
An: Lucene Users Group
Betreff: Negative boosting?
I've often found the use of query-based boosting to be very beneficial. This is
particularly so when it's easy t
I've often found the use of query-based boosting to be very beneficial. This is
particularly so when it's easy to identify the term that I want to stand out as a
primary selector.
However, I've come across quite a few other cases where it would be easier (and more
logical) to apply a negativ
