Polina Litvak writes:
Hi Daniel,
I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene and tried the whole thing
again: I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the query
Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B, and then I ran exactly
the same code with lucene-1.4.1.jar and
Hi Polima,
It seems to me that your query string is not correct ...
(A AND -(B))
AND = +
NOT = -
In lucene AND and NOT opperators are mapped internal to +/-,
(AND and NOT are supported only because they are comming from natural language)
so ...
A + - (B) makes no sense ...
Sergiu
Polina Litvak
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 17, 2004 2:31 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1
Polina Litvak writes:
Hi Daniel,
I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene and tried the whole
thing
again: I ran my code
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
(Morus Walter via Otis)
So is this behaviour a bug, or Lucene1.4 is not backwards compatible?
Polina
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 15, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: QueryParser.parse
On Thursday 16 September 2004 19:38, Polina Litvak wrote:
I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the query
Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B
This code:
Query query = QueryParser.parse(Field:(AAA AND -(BBB)), field, new
StandardAnalyzer());
I have a question regarding QueryParser and lucene-1.4.1.jar:
When using lucene-1.3-final.jar, a query of the form: Field:(A AND -(B))
was parsed into +Field:A -Field:B (using QueryParser.parse()).
After making the switch to lucene-1.4.1.jar, the same query is being
parsed into Field:A Field:-
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:58, Polina Litvak wrote:
Does anyone know how to work around this new feature ?
I can't remember any changes in this area, but I just tried with the
current version from CVS and the output is the one which you want.
Regards
Daniel
--
