--- Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jayant
Kumar wrote:
Thanks for the patch. It helped in increasing the
search speed to a good extent.
Good. I'll commit it. Thanks for testing it.
But when we tried to
give about 100 queries in 10 seconds, then again
we
found that after
Jayant Kumar wrote:
Thanks for the patch. It helped in increasing the
search speed to a good extent.
Good. I'll commit it. Thanks for testing it.
But when we tried to
give about 100 queries in 10 seconds, then again we
found that after about 15 seconds, the response time
per query increased.
Thanks for the patch. It helped in increasing the
search speed to a good extent. But when we tried to
give about 100 queries in 10 seconds, then again we
found that after about 15 seconds, the response time
per query increased. Enclosed is the dump which we
took after about 30 seconds of starting
Jayant Kumar wrote:
Please find enclosed jvmdump.txt which contains a dump
of our search program after about 20 seconds of
starting the program.
Also enclosed is the file queries.txt which contains
few sample search queries.
Thanks for the data. This is exactly what I was looking for.
Thread-14
Doug Cutting wrote:
Please tell me if you are able to simplify your queries and if that
speeds things. I'll look into a ThreadLocal-based solution too.
I've attached a patch that should help with the thread contention,
although I've not tested it extensively.
I still don't fully understand why
I noticed delays when concurrent threads query an IndexSearcher too.
our index is about 550MB with about 850,000 docs. each doc with 20-30
fields of which only 3 are indexed. Our queries are not very complex --
just 3 required term queries.
this is what my test did:
intialilize an array of
We conducted a test on our search for 500 requests
given in 27 seconds. We noticed that in the first 5
seconds, the results were coming in 100 to 500 ms. But
as the queue size kept increasing, the response time
of the search increased drastically to approx 80-100
seconds.
Please find enclosed
Jayant Kumar wrote:
We recently tested lucene with an index size of 2 GB
which has about 1,500,000 documents, each document
having about 25 fields. The frequency of search was
about 20 queries per second. This resulted in an
average response time of about 20 seconds approx
per search.
That sounds
