Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread John Haxby
Kevin L. Cobb wrote: We recently started using SVN for SCM, were using VSS. We're trying out approach A, branching off for each release. Development always develops on the trunk, except when a bug is discovered that needs to be patched to a previous version of the product. When that scenario comes

RE: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Kevin L. Cobb
ED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:50 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Hello ALL, It might not be the right place for it but as we are talking about SCM, I have a quick question. First, I haven't used CVS/SVN on any project. I am a ClearCase/PVCS guy. I just

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Erik Hatcher
We can work the 1.x and 2.0 lines of code however we need to. We can branch (a branch or tag in Subversion is inexpensive and a constant time operation). How we want to manage both versions of Lucene is open for discussion. Nothing about Subversion changes how we manage this from how we'd do

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Miles Barr
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:11 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote: > I've seen both of these types of procedures followed on Apache > projects. It really just depends. Lucene's codebase is not being > modified frequently, so it is not necessary to branch and merge back. > Rather we simply develop off of

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Chris Lamprecht
t (either file or dir) between two releases (say LUCENE > 1.4 and 1.5). > > Thanks in advance for your time. > Chakra Yadavalli > http://jroller.com/page/cyblogue > > > -Original Message----- > > From: aurora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, Februar

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Hatcher
: aurora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:25 PM To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN with my favourite file manager Total Commander 6.5. The svn status and commands are read

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Chakra Yadavalli
nce for your time. Chakra Yadavalli http://jroller.com/page/cyblogue > -Original Message- > From: aurora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:25 PM > To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion conversion > > Subversion rocks!

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread aurora
Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN with my favourite file manager Total Commander 6.5. The svn status and commands are readily integrated with the file manager. Offline diff and revert are two things I really like from svn. The conversion to Subversion is

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Paul Elschot
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:20, Erik Hatcher wrote: > The conversion to Subversion is complete. The new repository is > available to users read-only at: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk > Great. I just checked out the trunk: Checked out revision 151042. So much

Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Hatcher
The conversion to Subversion is complete. The new repository is available to users read-only at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk Besides /trunk, there is also /branches and /tags. /tags contains all the CVS tags made so that you could grab a snapshot of a previous ve