RE: Sorting Options for Query Results

2001-11-19 Thread Jeff Kunkle
This sounds like a good solution, but may not be viable in my situation. I think I might run into problems since my index changes very often; several times an hour. I don't think it would be very efficient to rebuild the field mapped array after each new document is incrementally added to the

RE: Sorting Options for Query Results

2001-11-19 Thread Doug Cutting
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I think this still works if the the document number continue to increase by one when documents are added incrementally. Does anyone know if this is true (I haven't looked at the code yet). Yes, that is true, so long as you do not delete

Meta Tag Question

2001-11-19 Thread Michael, Michelle R
Hello. We currently have an older version of Lucene running on our intranet, which I did not install (I'm new to Lucene), and I've been testing it out. I noticed that it appears not to be using meta tag information in ranking or in displaying. I was wondering if the newer version will allow this

Html documents parsing

2001-11-19 Thread Emmanuel Bridonneau
I am confused about how Lucene performs the parsing of an Html document. It doesn't do any tag striping (or does it?) consequently does that mean it also indexes all html tags? If so then a request for searching body will return any and all html documents previously indexed. I'd appreciate anyone

Re: Can't locate field

2001-11-19 Thread Cecil, Paula New
here is the full indexing code. and it does use the SimpleAnalyzer. thanks for your help! import java.io.File; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.OutputStream; import java.util.*; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.SimpleAnalyzer; import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter; import

Attribute Search

2001-11-19 Thread Cecil, Paula New
I am trying index a set of data, storing only a primary key. This primary key I left un-indexed. There is one text field, that I indexed and tokenized. The others I neither want to store or tokenized. My reasoning was that not tokenizing would produce the smallest index. The remaining

RE: Attribute Search

2001-11-19 Thread Emmanuel Bridonneau
I am new here too but here's my 2 cents. If you don't tokenize your db textvalues, what do you say will be the resulting terms indexed? I think not what you expect. Your non tokenized fields probably are not filtered out hence a lastname like 'Smith' will not be a hit if the query is 'smith' the