On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 23:07, stephane vaucher wrote:
I've tested the following. I don't know if I'm hitting expected
behaviour, but it seems suspicious:
Hi,
You might like to see this thread to lucene-dev from a couple of months
ago:
-
Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs.
Maybe you can show the actual output of this piece of code.
What do you get? Show...
--- Rob Outar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otis,
Tried this:
f = doc.get(key);
while (f != null ) {
l.add(f);
//get next value for same key
f =
Hi:
I downloaded the lucene source and have been trying to build using
ant. I am getting the following error message:
--
-
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
javacc_check:
compile:
[javacc] java was not
I would like to buy a book about Lucene.
Who could write it ? : )
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hello all,
I am indexing the date using the java.io.file.lastModified() method
doc.add(new Field(MODIFIED_DT,
DateField.timeToString(f.lastModified()), true, true, true));
I am trying to search on this field, but I am having a hard time formatting
the date correctly. I am not sure
William,
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 21:14, you wrote:
I would like to buy a book about Lucene.
Who could write it ? : )
AFAIK there is no book, but some articles might help:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cs?q=doug+cuttingsubmit=Search+Documentscs=1
Optimizations for Dynamic Inverted Index
Ah, for some reason i thought none of the Lucene methods were thread safe,
or is this only in the case of reading and writing at the same time? I
thought I read this in the FAQ.
Roy.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:04
Reding and writing at the same time is okay. Only one thread can
modify the index at a time.
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, for some reason i thought none of the Lucene methods were thread
safe,
or is this only in the case of reading and writing at the same time?
I
thought I read
doug,
if you happen to remember this thread, i was wanting to know if you
had any thoughts on improving this search in the situation below, my
temp fix does not work in all situations, so i am back to square one.
i have completely gutted the RangeQuery and created an additional
RangeScorer to
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Reding and writing at the same time is okay. Only one thread can
modify the index at a time.
Almost. Only one process can modify it at a time, other processes will
be prevented by the write.lock file. Multiple threads can modify an
index simultaneously. The bulk of
Hi,
I'm a lucene newbie. I wanted to ask someone's expert
opinion on how to attack this issue. I have a set of
documents (a catalog) that many clients want to
register with the search server. While those clients
are reachable their catalog should be available, but
if they log off or disappear
Is 0 in the list of your stop words?
Otis
--- Eric Fixler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I have a field in an index that stores item id's which can be
zero. I use a TermQuery to search for these, and everything works
fine
except when I'm searching for things with id 0; these entries
I wrote a few articles that I'm trying to publish somewhere now.
Cheaper than a book :)
Otis
--- William W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to buy a book about Lucene.
Who could write it ? : )
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus
I wish I had time to work on this for fun, but I was thinking about what
could be a fun lucene project...
One could build a peer-to-peer document search application. Each client
would index the documents on its harddrive, or documents in a particular
directory. When the user at the computer does
Hi. Thanks for the reply.
I'm just using StandardAnalyzers with the no-args contructor; 0 does
not appear to be one of the STOP_WORDS.
eric
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 08:56 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Is 0 in the list of your stop words?
Otis
--- Eric Fixler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My bug; checking to see if form fields not empty was a little but
over-aggressive.
As always, thanks for the help (and thanks for lucene!)
eric
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo