On Wednesday 17 November 2004 01:20, Edwin Tang wrote:
Hello,
I have been using DateFilter to limit my search results to a certain date
range. I am now asked to replace this filter with one where my search
results
have document IDs greater than a given document ID. This document ID is
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 07:10, Karthik N S wrote:
Hi guy's
Apologies.
So A Mergeed Index is again a Single [ addition of subIndexes... ),
If that case , If One of the Field Types is of type 'Field.Keyword'
whic is Unique across the subIndexes [Before Merging].
I was thinking that perhaps I can pre-stem words before sticking them in a
search field in the database perhaps using Lucene stemming code, then try to
use the Natural Language Search found in MySql 4.1.1. I am confident the
MySql product can't keep up with Lucene yet, but at least they hvae
Hi Guys
Apologies..
I am Still Confused.. ;(
Let me make it more simple Question
On using Search from a Index without any SearchWord, I would like to
count the total number of Documents present in it.
[ I Only have the Field Types 'Field.Keyword' which stores the Unique
HI ALL
I am having index file created by other people
Now i want to know how many field are there in the index
Is there any third party tool to do this
I saw some where some GUI tool to do this but forgot the name.
Regards
LingaRaju
Try using :
Luke : http://www.getopt.org/luke/
Limo : http://limo.sourceforge.net/
Regards,
Kiran.
-Original Message-
From: lingaraju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 16:00
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: tool to check the index field
HI ALL
I am having index file
Yes, IndexSearcher is thread safe.
Aviran
http://www.aviransplace.com
-Original Message-
From: Abhay Saswade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 15:16 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: best ways of using IndexSearcher
Hello,
Can I use single instance of
Ah... recoding DateFilter. I will look into this today. Thanks for the help.
Ed
--- Paul Elschot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 01:20, Edwin Tang wrote:
Hello,
I have been using DateFilter to limit my search results to a certain date
range. I am now asked to
Thanks for the suggestions Erik. Displaying the query string is really
usefull
and this is what i've found.
I issue a search using the search term
ResponseHelper.writeNoCachingHeaders\(response\);
The search is parsed using a query parser and produces the following query
string
Try this:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
Luke
- Original Message -
From: lingaraju [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: tool to check the index field
HI ALL
I am having index file created by other people
Now
Whats the bestway to copy an index from one directory to another? I
tried opening an IndexWriter at the new location and used addIndexes to
read from the old index. But that was very slow.
Thanks in advance,
Ravi.
-
To
On Nov 17, 2004, at 7:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I then try a search using the term
ResponseHelper.writeNoCachingHeaders\(*\);
now I'm expecting this to be a wider search term and it should find at
least two, possibly more docs?
the query parser produces the query
Thanks a lot for the solution / explanation. Saved the day Erik.
Summary
Observation: Using a wild carded search term with queryParser and the
WhitespaceAnalyser returned no hits when when hits where expected.
Reason: This was caused by the default behaviour of queryParser to lower
case
Hi, i downloading pdfbox 0.6.4 , what add in the source code the
demo`s lucene
--
Miguel Angel Angeles R.
Asesoria en Conectividad y Servidores
Telf. 97451277
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
test
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Enumerating the terms using WildcardTermEnum and an IndexReader seems to be too
buggy to use.
I'm now reimplementing my code using WildcardTermEnum.wildcardEquals which
seems to be better so
far.
--- Sanyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have following problem with 1.4.2:
I'm searching for
You could lock your index for writes, then copy the file using
operating system copy commands.
Another way would be to lock your index, make a filesystem snapshot,
then unlock your index. You can then safely copy the snapshot without
interupting further index operations.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004
i noticed in the last period that alot of people disscus with each others
about the bugs of lucene ...
but something is missing ... i consider lucene is an indexing tool for text
files and so one ...
but there are alot of tools that makes this indexing like access ...
what about compression
The HEAD version of CVS supports gz compression. You will need to
check it out using cvs if you want to use it.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:43:36 +0200, abdulrahman galal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i noticed in the last period that alot of people disscus with each others
about the bugs of lucene ...
Hey all;
I have ran into an interesting case.
Our system has notes. These need to be indexed. They are xml files called
default.xml and are easily parsed and indexed. No problem, have been doing it
all week.
The problem is if someone edits the note, the system doesn't update the
default.xml.
Can somebody explain the difference between the parameters minMergeDocs
and mergeFactor in IndexWriter. When I read the documentation, it looks
like both of them represent number of documents to be in buffer before
they are merged into a new segment.
Thanks in advance,
Ravi.
Split the filename into basefilename and version and make each a keyword.
Sort your query by version descending, and only use the first
basefile you encounter.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:05:19 -0500, Luke Shannon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all;
I have ran into an interesting case.
Our
That is a good idea. Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Justin Swanhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: version documents
Split the filename into basefilename and version and make each a
keyword.
Sort
Hi
I need some kind of implementation of SVD (singular value decomposition) or
LSI with Lucene engine. Have anyone any ideas how to create a query table
for decomposition? The table must have documents as rows and terms as
columns, if a term is presented in the docuement, the corresponding
Is there a way to use Lucene stemming and stop word removal without using the
rest of the tool? I am downloading the code now, but I imagine the answer
might be deeply burried. I would like to be able to send in a phrase and get
back a collection of keywords if possible.
I am thinking of
Yes, you can use just the Analysis part. For instance, I use this for
http://www.simpy.com and I believe we also have this in the Lucene book
as part of the source code package:
/**
* Gets Tokens extracted from the given text, using the specified
Analyzer.
*
* @param analyzer
This is so cool Otis. I was just to write this off of something in the FAQ,
but this is better then what I was doing.
This rocks!!! Thank you.
JohnE
P.S.: I am assuming you use org.apache.lucene.analysis.Token? There are
three Token's under Lucene.
- Original Message -
From:
John,
It actually should be pretty easy to use just the parts of Lucene you
want (the analyzers, etc) without using the rest. See the example of
the PorterStemmer from this article:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/01/15/lucene.html?page=2
You could feed a Reader to the tokenStream()
I thank you both. I have it already partly implemented here. It seems easy.
At least this should carry through my product until I can really get to use
Lucene. I am not sure how far I can take MySql with stemmed, indexed key
words, but should give me maybe 6 monthes at least of something
Thanks. I was looking for an o/s independent way of copying. Probably I
can use BufferedInputStream and BufferedOutputStream classes to copy the
index to a different location.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Swanhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:35 PM
30 matches
Mail list logo
