Thought you might be interested.
http://homepage.mac.com/zoe_info/
powered by lucene ;-)
PA
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm running into this exception quiet often while using Lucene (the
situation is so bad with the latest rc, that I had to revert to the last
com.lucene package). I'm sure I have my fair share of bugs in my app,
but nonetheless, how can I control Lucene usage of RandomAccessFile?
The
using a RAMDir as a middle man solved my problems...
Thanks. What's is your heuristic to flush the RAMDirectory? Also how do
you deal with System.exit() or application death? Eg, your are indexing
something and the application dies or is killed.
Thanks for any input.
R.
--
To unsubscribe,
Thanks. What's is your heuristic to flush the RAMDirectory?
please explain this because i don't understand english that good :-(
That's ok, I don't really understand English either :-)
Simply put, when do you flush the RAMDirectory into the FSDirectory?
Every five documents? Ten? A thousand?
Hello again,
There is no tool to detect index corruption, fixing of indexing, nor
index rebuilding.
The last one anyone can/has to do on their own.
:-( Well, that *very* sad to say the least... How do I know if my
indexes are not corrupted even if everything seems to be working fine?
Don't
Hello again,
I guess it's really not my day...
Just to make sure I'm not hallucinating to much, I downloaded the latest
and greatest: rc4. Changed all the packages names to org.apache. Updated
a method here and there to reflect the APIs changes. And run my little
app. I would like to
Have you posted code that demonstrates this problem? If so I missed it.
Thanks for your help.
PA.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steven,
Sounds like a pretty nasty situation.
It is...
This makes sense - any effort to solve the problem will first involve
isolating the
bug, and that's a task you're best suited for, since you know your
system best.
Ok... From what I understand, this situation arise depending on
Hello again,
attached is the source code of the only class interacting directly with
Lucene in my app. Sorry for not providing a complete test case as it's
hard for me to come up with something self contained. Maybe there is
something that's obviously wrong in what I'm doing.
Thanks for any
I don't know what environment you're using Lucene in. However, we had
this too
many open files problem on our Solaris box, and increasing the number
of file
descriptors through the ulimit -n command fixed it.
Thanks. That should help. However, I have a little desktop app and it
will be
On Tuesday, 9. April 2002 14:08, you wrote:
root wrote:
Doesn't Lucene releases the filehandles??
because I get too many open files in system after running lucene a
while!
Are you closing the readers and writers after you've finished using
them?
cheers,
Chris
Yes I close the
I would add some logging to the code
You lost me here... Where should I add some logging?
to get more idea of which Lucene methods are
actually being called, when, in what sequence.
I typical sequence looks like that:
- search()
- deleteIndexWithID()
- indexValuesWithID()
PA
--
To
how many open files you think can be used at your process??
Not sure. It varies with usage pattern. I will check it out in any case.
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
cat: /proc/sys/fs/file-max: No such file or directory
echo 5 /proc/sys/fs/file-max
Unfortunately, I cannot use this kind of
Does this mean you tried it on other OSs and it worked?
Yes.
Which ones?
Win2k SP2
What JDK did those have
jre 1.4.0
and what was their ulimit and what is the
ulimit on your OSX machine?
Just curious.
I don't know. Does it matter?
PA
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
First of, thanks to Jagadesh Nandasamy who directed me to the right
direction.
It seems, that in my situation, more homogeneous indexes work better
than fewer heterogeneous indexes:
I have a dozen class that I'm indexing. They vary from two fields to
more than a dozen field per document (aka
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 01:57 AM, Steven J. Owens wrote:
Just be glad you aren't doing this on Solaris with JDK 1.1.6
I know... In fact I'm looking forward to port my stuff to 1.4... As my
app is very much IO bond I'm really excited by this nio madness... :-)
Yes and no. Setting
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 12:41 AM, Dmitry Serebrennikov wrote:
- the number of files that Lucene uses depends on the number of
segments in the index and the number of *stored* fields
- if your fields are not stored but only indexed, they do not require
separate files. Otherwise, an
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 10:46 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hm, this should be a FAQ.
Maybe it should... ;-)
Check Lucene contributions page, there are some starting points there,
Well, this seems to be a very popular request... In fact I need
something like that also. Unfortunately,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 05:41 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Wouldn't you want to convert to XML instead and use XSLT to transform
the XML representation to any desired format by just applying a style
sheet?
Sounds like less work with bigger document type coverage.
Sounds good... But
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 03:16 PM, Moturu,Praveen wrote:
Can I assume none of the poeple on the lucene user group had
implemented indexing a pdf document using lucene.
Who knows...?!? In any case, it's not public knowledge...
If some one has.. Please help me by providing the solution.
FYI.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Alex Horovitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon May 27, 2002 01:58:27 PM Europe/Zurich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], toni Trujillo-Vian
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
For entertainment purpose only, ZOË's source code is available at:
http://guests.evectors.it/zoe/
PA.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm releasing Zoe under the Apple Public Source License and putting
together a SourceForge project to coordinate the future development of
Zoe. Our plan is to choose a handful of experienced developers to form
the core development team for Zoe. Anyone is free to contribute code
which
On Monday, June 3, 2002, at 04:44 PM, Peter Carlson wrote:
Good luck with your project.
It looks very exciting and refreshing. I haven't tried it yet, but the
screen shots look useful and beautiful.
Thanks.
I hope that you will stay active in the Lucne user community and
contribute
Hello,
I was wandering if anybody knows of a Lucene port to straight C or
Objective C...?!?
I need something equivalent to Lucene (but native if possible) on Mac OS
X...
Thanks for any pointers!-)
PA.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 03:41 , Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
The only thing that I can think of right now is omseek on sf.net, but
that project seems somewhat dead. I think that is in C or C++.
Thanks. I also found something called Onix (http://www.lextek.com/onix/)
Anybody have any
Hi James,
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 03:52 , Brook, James wrote:
How about this? I think it's what they use for Sherlock.
Apple Information Access Toolkit (AIAT)
http://www.devworld.apple.com/dev/aiat/
Well, that's basically the first incarnation of Lucene :-) And in fact I
was
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 04:04 , Brook, James wrote:
It looks like it's available for FTP download as an 'SDK' on this page
http://developer.apple.com/sdk/
I have no idea whether this is up-to-date or compatible with the latest
OS
X.
Thanks. I will take a look into it.
Cheers,
Hello,
I was wandering what would be a good way to incorporate text format
information in Lucene word/document scoring. For example, when turning
HTML into plain text for indexing purpose, a lot of potentially useful
information are lost: eg tags like bold, strong and so on could be
Hi Alex,
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 11:13 , Alex Murzaku wrote:
Hi PA! How are things going?
Doing all right :-)
It's an interesting question but I don't think Lucene
(as it is today) could change weights based on
semantics (either assigned by formatting tags or maybe
looked up in
Hello,
I would like to use Lucene as a kind of lookup table (aka Map):
A document would have two fields:
- the first field would represent a random lookup key in the form of a
Field.Keyword
- the second field would be an object id also stored as a Field.Keyword
Which sounds fine in theory.
On Friday, Sep 27, 2002, at 13:27 Europe/Zurich, petite_abeille wrote:
- the first field would represent a random lookup key in the form of a
Field.Keyword
Ooops... I should have mention that the key field is stored as Field(
aKey, aValue, false, true, false): eg not stored, indexed
Hello,
This is slightly off topic but...
Does anyone have a handy library to compute readability score?
Something like Flesch Reading Ease score Co:
http://thibs.menloschool.org/~djwong/docs/wordReadabilityformulas.html
Would you like to share?-)
Thanks.
R.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 20:46 Europe/Zurich, petite_abeille wrote:
Does anyone have a handy library to compute readability score?
Here is an extract from a paper describing the Flesch index and an
algorithm to count syllables... Does that make any sense?
Thanks.
The Flesch index
On Friday, Dec 6, 2002, at 11:12 Europe/Zurich, Ashley Collins wrote:
I'm using Lucene to index MIME messages and have a couple of questions.
You should take a look at ZOE as it does all that and more. It's open
source and uses Lucene to index every single bits of email.
On Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002, at 07:16 Europe/Zurich, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
It uses Lucene as an
object store, of sort, I believe, with variuos relations between
objects (I did not look at the source, but I suspect it does this based
on the functionality it offers).
Yep. The basic approach
On Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002, at 15:21 Europe/Zurich, Cohan, Sean wrote:
Is there a better way to provide an acceptable searching mechanism
using the
relational database engine?
Well it depend of what you mean by acceptable... but if you are using
Oracle, you should look into Oracle Text:
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/Zurich, Doug Cutting wrote:
Index updates are atomic, so it is very unlikely that the index is
corrupted, unless the underlying file system itself is corrupted.
Ummm... Perhaps in theory... In practice, indexes seems to get
corrupted quiet easily in
On Friday, Dec 20, 2002, at 19:48 Europe/Zurich, Doug Cutting wrote:
Can you provide a reproducible test case that demonstrates index
corruption?
I honestly wish I could. Unfortunately, because of the nature of the
application (Otis is familiar with it), I never seem to be able to come
up
Hello,
I'm in the process of creating the about page for my app and I was
wondering what are the requirements to get included in the Powered by
Lucene page?
The app is a desktop application... it's not a web site. The only
requirement I see is Please include something like the following with
Hi,
Would it be possible for Lucene to provide package informations?
Basically all the java.lang.Package attributes... Things like
implementation vendor, name, version and so on... This would make it
easier to identify which packages/versions are used.
Thanks.
PA.
--
To unsubscribe,
On Friday, Dec 20, 2002, at 21:44 Europe/Zurich, Eric Isakson wrote:
I think this info is available via the Manifest that is created during
the build. This is cut from the build.xml from the latest CVS...
Great! I must have overlooked it somehow.
Thanks.
PA.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Friday, Dec 27, 2002, at 18:22 Europe/Zurich, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
It would be nice to make that Lucene image clickable, which should be a
piece of cake, since Zoe uses HTML for rendering the UI.
Doable?
Well... yes. This is how it works in the application itself: you can
click on the
On Monday, Dec 30, 2002, at 15:01 Europe/Zurich, Erik Hatcher wrote:
If you have control over the HTML, how about marking the navbar pieces
with a certain CSS class and then filtering that out from what you
index? It seems like that would be a reasonable way to filter it -
but this is of
Hello,
Here is a pretty fatal exception I get from time to time in Lucene...
java.io.IOException: read past EOF
at
org.apache.lucene.store.FSInputStream.readInternal(FSDirectory.java:277)
at org.apache.lucene.store.InputStream.readBytes(Unknown Source)
at
On Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003, at 11:48 Europe/Zurich, Andrzej Bialecki
wrote:
This is strange, or at least counter-intuitive - if you buffer larger
parts of data in RAM than the standard implementation does, it should
definitely be faster... Let's wait and see what Terry comes up with.
BTW. how
On Monday, Feb 24, 2003, at 20:28 Europe/Zurich, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
I have some good experiences with JTidy. It works like DOM-XML parser
and cleans HTML it by the way.
I use jtidy also. Both for parsing and clean-up. Works pretty nicely.
This is VERY useful, because EVERY HTML have at least
Another fine article by Otis:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/03/05/lucene.html
PA.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
This is more a sanity check, than anything else, but...
I'm trying to delete a document using IndexReader.delete(Term)... (for
the record I'm using 1.3-rc1)
The document was created with a Field.Keyword() to uniquely identify it.
The document exists, was saved, can be queried, life is
Hi Erik,
On Wednesday, Aug 27, 2003, Erik Hatcher wrote:
What you are doing looks fine to me. I'm sure these are obvious
questions, kinda like is your computer plugged in?, but here goes:
- How are you determining that the document is still there? With an
IndexReader? IndexSearcher?
- A
Hi Otis,
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Has anyone written an application that uses Lucene to index Java code,
either from the source .java files, or compiled .class files?
If you are talking about my ultra secret project Zapata: Coding
Mexican Style, then yes ;)
But... it
:
http://homepage.mac.com/petite_abeille/MagicHat/
But from the sound of what Otis is saying this is not what you guys are
looking for... back to the pampa then...
Cheers,
PA.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:07 Europe/Zurich, Nicolas Maisonneuve
wrote:
I.B.M can be a host or acronym, so threre is a problem , no ?
Perhaps as far as this parser goes... but... in practice... '.M' is not
a valid TLD.
PA.
Can I send a small lucene index by SOAP/TCP/HTTP/RMI? Is there a way
to serialize a Lucene Index?
I wan to send it from the Indexer server to the Search Server, and
then do a merge operation in the Search Server with the previous index
file.
Well, what about a very old fashioned way instead?
I, like a lot of other people are new to Lucene. Practical examples
are pretty scarce.
If you don't mind learning by example, take a look at the Powered by
Lucene page. A fair number of those projects are open source.
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/powered.html
PA.
Hi Otis,
On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 13:56 Europe/Amsterdam, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
I cannot remember the answer I got, but I asked the same question after
the code was changed to put locks in java.io.tmpdir.
Because I have an application that deals with a lot of indices
simultaneously, I
[Posted to Dev by mistake]
[Reposted to User]
[Sorry for the mess]
Hello,
I recently updated from 1.3 RC1 to the latest cvs version. RC1 has
proven very reliable for me, but I needed Dmitry compound index
functionality. Therefore the move to the cvs version.
I have been using 1.3 RC1 without
Hello,
This is pretty much off topic, but...
ZOE has been nominated as one of the candidate project to go the Open
Source Innovation Area on the COMDEX Exhibit Floor.
http://www.oreillynet.com/contest/comdex/
ZOE is one of the few Java project short listed and it uses Lucene
quiet
Hello,
What could cause such weird exception?
RAMInputStream.init: java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.lucene.store.RAMInputStream.init(RAMDirectory.java:217)
at org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory.openFile(RAMDirectory.java:182)
at
Hi Otis,
On Wednesday, Oct 22, 2003, at 18:06 Europe/Amsterdam, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
Since 'files' is a Hashtable, neither the key nor the value (file) can
be null, even though the NPE in RAMInputStream constructor implies that
file was null.
Yep... pretty weird... but looking at
Hello,
On Wednesday, Oct 22, 2003, at 18:13 Europe/Amsterdam, Doug Cutting
wrote:
A new Lucene release is available.
Very nice. Thanks :)
Quick question regarding release note number 11:
What's the difference between IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader[]) and
On Oct 29, 2003, at 19:08, Ronald Muller wrote:
What is the advantage of using a FileLock object instead of the way
Lucene
does it? (I do not see it)
Less code. Less worries.
Also note an mportant limitation:
File locks are held on behalf of the entire Java virtual machine.
They are
not
On Oct 30, 2003, at 13:36, Pasha Bizhan wrote:
I think that it's problem of java version of Lucene.
Because all core algorithms of Lucene and Lucene.Net are identical.
Talking of which... it appears... that... something... is... wrong...
somewhere...
This definitely needs some additional
Hello,
Indexing a multitude of esoteric formats (MS Office, PDF, etc) is a
popular question on this list...
The traditional approach seems to be to try to find some kind of format
specific reader to properly extract the textual part of such documents
for indexing. The drawback of such an
Hi Stefan,
On Oct 30, 2003, at 21:02, Stefan Groschupf wrote:
just to let you know, i had implement for the nutch project a plugin
that can parse 182 file formats including m$ office.
I simply use open office and use the available java api.
Yes, I saw that. Great work :)
Unfortunately, using
On Oct 30, 2003, at 20:48, Ben Litchfield wrote:
Unfortunately, it is not quite so easy. I am not sure about Word
documents
The raw text is visible.
but PDFs usually have there contents compressed
Yep. PDF is really an image format ;)
so a raw
fishing around for text would be pointless.
That's
On Nov 04, 2003, at 13:04, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Eventually i am going to try to implement something similar to google
groups, indexing lots of NNTP traffic. Has anyone done this before
with lucune?
Not that I know, but people have used Lucene to index their email,
which is somewhat similar.
On Nov 04, 2003, at 19:28, Tate Avery wrote:
Does anyone have any creative ideas for tackling this problem with
Lucene?
Perhaps Not sure if this quiet what you are after, but you could
take a look at ZOE's SZObject framework. It's build on top of Lucene to
provide lightweight ODBMS like
Hi Dror,
On Nov 04, 2003, at 19:33, Dror Matalon wrote:
By the way, we're also thinking of integrating newsgroups into RSS
aggregator which you can see at www.fastbuzz.com.
ZOE does something similar already.
It can vend messages as RSS feeds:
On Nov 11, 2003, at 16:05, Marcel Stör wrote:
As everybody seems to be so exited about it, would someone please be
so kind to explain
what document based clustering is?
This mostly means finding document which are similar in some way(s).
The similitude is mostly in the eyes of the beholder. In
On Nov 11, 2003, at 16:58, Tate Avery wrote:
Categorization typically assigns documents to a node in a pre-defined
taxonomy.
For clustering, however, the categorization 'structure' is emergent...
i.e. the clusters (which are analogous to taxonomy nodes) are created
dynamically based on the
On Nov 11, 2003, at 21:32, maurits van wijland wrote:
There is the carrot project :
http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/dweiss/carrot/
Leo Galambos, author of the Egothor project, constantly supports us
with fresh ideas and includes Carrot components in his own project!
Hi Ralf,
On Nov 12, 2003, at 14:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know good articles which demonstrate parts of that or
give a
good start into Lucene?
Otis Gospodnetic's articles are a good starting point:
Introduction to Text Indexing with Apache Jakarta Lucene
On Nov 11, 2003, at 21:02, Bruce Ritchie wrote:
Just a note the LSI is encumbered by US patents 4,839,853 and
5,301,109. It would be wise to make sure that any implementation is
either blessed by the patent holders or does not infringe on the
patents.
Since when did developers turn into
On Nov 13, 2003, at 19:00, Dror Matalon wrote:
I've been experimenting with it and it seems to work as advertised. It
has the advantage of not requiring *any* write capability in /tmp or
anywhere else.
There is a system property to turn off the lock files altogether.
PA.
On Nov 13, 2003, at 22:32, Jie Yang wrote:
I am trying to optimse the 500 OR
terms so that it does not do a full 2 millions docs
search but on the 1000 returned.
Would it be beneficial to move the first result set into its own
(transient) index to perform the second part of your query?
PA.
On Nov 14, 2003, at 19:50, Chong, Herb wrote:
if you are handling inter correlation properly, then terms can't cross
sentence boundaries.
Could you not break down your document along sentences boundary? If you
manage to figure out what a sentence is, that is.
if you are not paying attention to
On Nov 14, 2003, at 20:27, Dror Matalon wrote:
I might be the only person on the list who's having a hard time
following this discussion.
Nope. I don't understand a word of what those guys are talking about
either :)
Would one of you wise folks care to point me
to a good dummies, also known as
On Nov 14, 2003, at 20:29, Philippe Laflamme wrote:
Rules of linguistics? Is there such a thing? :)
Actually, yes there is. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a very
broad
research subject but a lot has come out of it.
A lot of what? If statements? :)
More specifically, Rule-based taggers
On Nov 14, 2003, at 21:16, Chong, Herb wrote:
if you know what TREC is, you know what i meant earlier. this isn't
exotic technology, this is close to 15 year old technology.
This is not really what I asked. What I would be interested to know is
what approach you consider to provide the biggest
On Nov 14, 2003, at 21:14, Philippe Laflamme wrote:
Rules of linguistics? Is there such a thing? :)
Actually, yes there is. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a very
broad
research subject but a lot has come out of it.
A lot of what? If statements? :)
Yes... just like every software boils down
On Nov 19, 2003, at 18:14, Don Kaiser wrote:
If you do this will the old version of the document be replaced by the
new one?
No. They will coexist. In Lucene, an update implies a delete/insert
sequence.
PA.
-
To unsubscribe,
Hello,
I'm trying to move a Document from one Index to another, without
necessarily reindexing it...
The Document is composed of one Field.Keyword and a bunch of
Field.UnStored.
Reading such a Document from one index and then adding it to another
one doesn't seems to have the expected effect
On Nov 20, 2003, at 13:45, Eric Jain wrote:
If the document contains unstored fields, the only way to reconstruct
the document is by iterating through all terms in the index and picking
out those that reference the document.
Hmmm... how would you do that? Something along the lines of
On Nov 20, 2003, at 14:13, Eric Jain wrote:
That's what I had in mind, but maybe there is better way. Once all
terms
are collected, they can be reassembled into a new document that that
can
then be indexed again.
I see. Assuming I have the relevant terms for a given document, how
would a build
On Nov 20, 2003, at 14:34, Eric Jain wrote:
I believe a term always contains it's own text. (It must be somewhere,
after all...) Documents on the other hand may or may not contain the
original text, depending on whether a field is stored or not.
This seems to be the case: the term's text hold the
On Nov 20, 2003, at 14:34, Eric Jain wrote:
I see. Assuming I have the relevant terms for a given document, how
would a build a new document based on those terms? Something like
adding each term's field and text to the new document?
Yes.
Ok. Retrieving the term for a document turns out to be
http://hul.harvard.edu/jhove/
Might be of interest to some :)
Cheers,
PA.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Feb 05, 2004, at 13:01, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I believe it would be the value of a 'Message-ID' or 'Reference' or
'Reference-ID' message header.
However, I remember reading that mail readers are not very good at
sticking to a standard (some RFC, I guess), so they don't always
provide the
On Feb 10, 2004, at 14:03, Scott ganyo wrote:
I have. While document.add() itself doesn't increase over time, the
merge does. Ways of partially overcoming this include increasing the
mergeFactor (but this will increase the number of file handles used),
or building blocks of the index in
On Feb 10, 2004, at 14:53, Markus Brosch wrote:
My application will deal with small data sets. The problem is, that
I want
to index the content (String) of some objects. I want to refer to that
object once I found this by a keyword or whatever. So, using a simple
map or
tree?
Something along
On Feb 12, 2004, at 16:42, Abhay Saswade wrote:
How about creating spellcheck dictionary with all words in lucene
index?
That way you ensure that the word really exists in the index.
You can indeed use the terms identified by Lucene as the dictionary
words ands apply traditional spell checking
On Apr 13, 2004, at 02:45, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
He mentioned that I might be able to squeeze 5-10% out of index merges
this way.
Talking of which... what strategy(ies) do people use to minimize
downtime when updating an index?
My current strategy is as follow:
(1) use a temporary
On May 20, 2004, at 04:38, Erik Hatcher wrote:
OffTopic: havoc and Struts go well together ;) Pick up Tapestry
instead!
Nah. Keep it really Simple [1] instead :o)
http://simpleweb.sourceforge.net/
PA.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello,
I would like to provide an alternative query syntax for ranges by using
a colon (':') or two dots ('..') instead of ' TO '.
For example:
mod_date:[20020101:20030101]
Or
mod_date:[20020101..20030101]
What would be the correct procedure to modify the QueryParser to
achieve this? Should I
On Aug 31, 2004, at 17:17, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You also have a large number of
fields, and it looks like a lot (all?) of them are stored and indexed.
That's what that large .fdt file indicated. That file is 206 MB in
size.
Try using Field.UnStored() to avoid storing all those data in your
Hi Niraj,
On Sep 01, 2004, at 06:45, Niraj Alok wrote:
If I make some of them Field.Unstored, I can see from the javadocs
that it
will be indexed and tokenized but not stored. If it is not stored, how
can I
use it while searching?
The different type of fields don't impact how you do your
On Oct 13, 2004, at 15:26, Nader Henein wrote:
Well, are you storing any data for retrieval from the index, because
you could encrypt the actual data and then encrypt the search string
public key style.
Alternatively, write your index to an encrypted volume... something
along the line of
On Oct 15, 2004, at 16:10, Tom Cunningham wrote:
I'd be interested in trying to implement some of these ideas on Mac OS
X, mostly because it's not already covered by Google Desktop, and I
think the screensaver idea would work pretty well there. Anyone else
want to give this a shot?
Google
On Oct 28, 2004, at 20:26, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
http://www.peerfear.org/rss/permalink/2004/10/28/
LotsOfInterestInLuceneDesktop/
Many people, few ideas :)
http://www.popsearch.net/index.html
PA.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
