a matter of removing the field book and then readding it.
Anyhow let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
Funny how
OneSAF AI -- SAIC
Software\Data Engineer
321-235-7660
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
Would there be any abnormal effects
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
I reuse the same searcher, analyzer and Query object I don't think that
should cause the problem.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Alex Murzaku [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:22 PM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: RE
Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
Importance: High
Hi all,
This is too odd and I do not even know where to start. We built a Windows
Explorer type tool that indexes all files in a sabdboxed file system
Sounds like you either have an indexer that's run amok (maybe
a background process that's continually re-indexing your sandbox -
or expanding outside your sandbox) or your Query code is doing more
than querying. It's not behaviour I've seen. Without a snippet of
Query code, it's going to be hard
to the list to get more informed help...
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
Importance: High
Hi all,
This is too odd and I do not even know where to start. We
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Indexing Growth
Sounds like you either have an indexer that's run amok (maybe
a background process that's continually re-indexing your sandbox -
or expanding outside your sandbox) or your Query code
Sounds pretty scary. Please send the code because it's hard to believe
(but then most good bugs are ..)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
Importance: High
Hi all
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:32 PM
To: Lucene Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
I reuse the same searcher, analyzer and Query object I don't think that
should cause the problem.
Thanks,
Rob
Cc: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
What does the index directory look like before and after running
queries? Are files growing or being added? Which files? How many
documents are there in the index before and after? Are you absolutely
100% positive there is no way that your
Rob Outar writes:
After running first query to get all attributes from all files in the given
directory, there were 17 files, each file has 5 attributes so 85 queries
were ran:
can you post the java code used for querying?
Actually I don't understand, why you have to use one query for each
are indexing every time...
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:50 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
After building the index for the first time:
_l1d.f1 _l1d.f3 _l1d.f5 _l1d.f7 _l1d.f9 _l1d.fdx _l1d.frq
They look like the type of file name that would be created
when documents were added to the index. So I still think
something is adding stuff to your index. Could it be an
external process as someone suggested? Does the index
grow even if you don't search? In the code you posted,
what does
,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Rob Outar
Cc: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
They look like the type of file name that would be created
when documents were added to the index. So I still think
-Original Message-
From: Rob Outar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:32 PM
To: Lucene Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
I reuse the same searcher, analyzer and Query object I don't think
that
should cause the problem.
Thanks,
Rob
I found the freakin problem, I am going to kill my co-worker when he gets
in. He was removing a field and adding the same field back for each
document in the index in a piece of code I did not notice until
now He is so dead. I commented out that piece of code,
queried to my
Funny how this is the outcome of 90% of the problems people have with
software - their own mistakes :)
Regarding reindexing - no need for any explicit calls. When you add a
document to the index it is indexed right away. You will have to
detect index change (methods for that are there) and
Only when you add new documents to it.
Otis
--- Rob Outar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Will the index grow based on queries alone? I build my index, then
run
several queries against it and afterwards I check the size of the
index and
in some cases it has grown quite a bit
: Indexing Growth
Only when you add new documents to it.
Otis
--- Rob Outar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Will the index grow based on queries alone? I build my index, then
run
several queries against it and afterwards I check the size of the
index and
in some cases it has grown
Subject: Re: Indexing Growth
Only when you add new documents to it.
Otis
--- Rob Outar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Will the index grow based on queries alone? I build my index,
then
run several queries against it and afterwards I check the size of the
index and
in some cases
I reuse the same searcher, analyzer and Query object I don't think that
should cause the problem.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Alex Murzaku [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:22 PM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: RE: Indexing Growth
I don't know if I
21 matches
Mail list logo
