RE: Large index files

2004-07-23 Thread Karthik N S
Hi I think (a) would be a better choice [I have done it on Linux upt to 7GB , it's pretty faster then doing the same on win2000 PF] with regards Karthik -Original Message- From: Rupinder Singh Mazara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 5:55 PM To: Lucene Users

RE: Large index files

2004-07-23 Thread John Moylan
As long as your kernel has Large File Support, then you should be fine. Most modern distro's support 2GB files now out of the box. John On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 13:44, Karthik N S wrote: Hi I think (a) would be a better choice [I have done it on Linux upt to 7GB , it's pretty faster

Re: Large index files

2004-07-23 Thread Joel Shellman
I'm a little confused by this. I thought Lucene keeps creating new files as the index gets bigger and any single file doesn't ever get all that big. Is that not the case? Thanks, Joel Shellman John Moylan wrote: As long as your kernel has Large File Support, then you should be fine. Most modern

RE: Large index files

2004-07-23 Thread Rupinder Singh Mazara
: Re: Large index files I'm a little confused by this. I thought Lucene keeps creating new files as the index gets bigger and any single file doesn't ever get all that big. Is that not the case? Thanks, Joel Shellman John Moylan wrote: As long as your kernel has Large File Support, then you