RE: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser
Ah! Sorry about confusion. Otis --- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes . . . but you suggested that I post it to the User group (as > opposed > to the Dev group). > > > ~ > Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 > Senior Software Engineer > Emergint, Inc. > 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 > Louisville, KY 40202 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 502.852.1423 > 502.852.1589 fax > > The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains > information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the > Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure > Agreement, > and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is > intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > are > not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender > at > 502-852-1605. > > > -Original Message- > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Lucene Users List > Subject: Re: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser > > Didn't I reply to this yesterday? > > --- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have an index that has three fields in it. When I do a search > using > > MultiFieldQueryParser, the search applies the same importance > > (weight) > > to each of the fields. BUT, what if I want to apply a different > > weight > > to each field, i.e. I want to consider found terms from certain > > fields > > as less "important" than others. I have applied an algorithm to > help > > me > > do this, which involves searching each field separately and then > > recombining the results into a single collection, but hate to > > reinvent > > the wheel if I don't have to. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ > > > > Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > Emergint, Inc. > > > > 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 > > > > Louisville, KY 40202 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 502.852.1423 > > > > 502.852.1589 fax > > > > > > > > > > > > The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains > > information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the > > Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure > > Agreement, > > and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is > > intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > > are > > not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender > > at > > 502-852-1605. > > > > > > > > > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 05:43, Kevin L. Cobb wrote: > I have an index that has three fields in it. When I do a search using > MultiFieldQueryParser, the search applies the same importance (weight) > to each of the fields. BUT, what if I want to apply a different weight > to each field, i.e. I want to consider found terms from certain fields > as less "important" than others. I have applied an algorithm to help me > do this, which involves searching each field separately and then > recombining the results into a single collection, but hate to reinvent > the wheel if I don't have to. Have you looked at MultiFieldQueryParser source? It's a very simple class, and modifying it (making a new class) should be easy; pass in not only field names but also weights to apply? (as a sidenote, MultiFieldQueryParser does some unnecessary work as is... it seems to re-parse same query once for each field, could just clone it) -+ Tatu +- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser
Yes . . . but you suggested that I post it to the User group (as opposed to the Dev group). ~ Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 Senior Software Engineer Emergint, Inc. 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 Louisville, KY 40202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 502.852.1423 502.852.1589 fax The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure Agreement, and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender at 502-852-1605. -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:05 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser Didn't I reply to this yesterday? --- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an index that has three fields in it. When I do a search using > MultiFieldQueryParser, the search applies the same importance > (weight) > to each of the fields. BUT, what if I want to apply a different > weight > to each field, i.e. I want to consider found terms from certain > fields > as less "important" than others. I have applied an algorithm to help > me > do this, which involves searching each field separately and then > recombining the results into a single collection, but hate to > reinvent > the wheel if I don't have to. > > > > > > ~ > > Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 > > Senior Software Engineer > > Emergint, Inc. > > 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 > > Louisville, KY 40202 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 502.852.1423 > > 502.852.1589 fax > > > > > > The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains > information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the > Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure > Agreement, > and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is > intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > are > not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender > at > 502-852-1605. > > > > __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser
Didn't I reply to this yesterday? --- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an index that has three fields in it. When I do a search using > MultiFieldQueryParser, the search applies the same importance > (weight) > to each of the fields. BUT, what if I want to apply a different > weight > to each field, i.e. I want to consider found terms from certain > fields > as less "important" than others. I have applied an algorithm to help > me > do this, which involves searching each field separately and then > recombining the results into a single collection, but hate to > reinvent > the wheel if I don't have to. > > > > > > ~ > > Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 > > Senior Software Engineer > > Emergint, Inc. > > 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 > > Louisville, KY 40202 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 502.852.1423 > > 502.852.1589 fax > > > > > > The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains > information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the > Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure > Agreement, > and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is > intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you > are > not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender > at > 502-852-1605. > > > > __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weighted Search by Field using MultiFieldQueryParser
I have an index that has three fields in it. When I do a search using MultiFieldQueryParser, the search applies the same importance (weight) to each of the fields. BUT, what if I want to apply a different weight to each field, i.e. I want to consider found terms from certain fields as less "important" than others. I have applied an algorithm to help me do this, which involves searching each field separately and then recombining the results into a single collection, but hate to reinvent the wheel if I don't have to. ~ Kevin L Cobb, MT(ASCP), SCJP2 Senior Software Engineer Emergint, Inc. 501 E Broadway, Suite 250 Louisville, KY 40202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 502.852.1423 502.852.1589 fax The preceding e-mail message and attachments, if any, contains information that is confidential and qualifies as such under the Definition of Confidential Information in the Non-Disclosure Agreement, and may constitute non-public information and trade secrets. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender at 502-852-1605.
