Hi Kevin,
your idea could work for higher mega-byte ranges, I guess, don't know how
about several TBytes.
We have been considering a concept to use Lucene as an RDF backend for a
semantic search engine, because of its reported excellent scalability, on
the order of tens of Megs. The idea was
Why was an int chosen to represent document handles? Is there a reason
for this? Why wasn't a long chosen to represent document handles? 64
bits seems like the obvious choice here except for a potentially bloated
datastore (32 extra bits)
I guess one possible solution is to use multiple
On Monday 11 August 2003 01:07, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Why was an int chosen to represent document handles? Is there a reason
for this? Why wasn't a long chosen to represent document handles? 64
bits seems like the obvious choice here except for a potentially bloated
datastore (32 extra
I have been giving some thought to using Lucene as an RDF database.
I'm specifically thinking about the RDF model and not the RDF syntax.
Excellent idea! In fact, I am going to try it out right now...
Can anyone see any problems here? This database will eventually grow
to around 2TB in the
Hi,
When I give a search query like title:(\\) QueryParser throws an error. But
same query given without any braces i.e title:\\ works fine.
Why is it so ?
thanks for your help,
vikas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
