Erik,
On Saturday 19 February 2005 01:33, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
On Friday 18 February 2005 21:55, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
Erik,
Just curious: it would seem easier to use multiple fields
Hi Bryan,
How big is your index?
Also what is the advantage of binding a user to a
server?
Thanks.
Andy
--- Bryan McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi chris,
I'm responsible for the webshots.com search index
and we've had very
good results with lucene. It currently indexes over
100
On Feb 19, 2005, at 3:52 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
By lowercasing the querytext and searching in title_lc ?
Well sure, but how about this query:
title:Something AND anotherField:someOtherValue
QueryParser, as-is, won't be able to do field-name swapping. I could
certainly apply that
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:45:50PM -0500, Mike Rose wrote:
I can comment on this since I'm in the middle of excising Oracle text
searching and replacing it with Lucene in one of my projects.
Intereseting, particularly as it's from somebody who's already
tried an existing in-db fulltext
On Saturday 19 February 2005 11:02, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 19, 2005, at 3:52 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
By lowercasing the querytext and searching in title_lc ?
Well sure, but how about this query:
title:Something AND anotherField:someOtherValue
QueryParser, as-is, won't be
Hi
When I try to search for phrases using the MultiFieldQueryParser v1.8
from CVS, it gives me NullPointerException.
Using the following keyword works:
title:IBM backs linux
However, it gives me the exception if I use the following keyword:
IBM backs linux
Any idea why? I am using this
Michael Celona wrote:
My index is changing in real time constantly... in this case I guess this
will not work for me any suggestions...
using a singleton pattern for the your index searcher makes sense anyway
... I don'T think that you change
the index after each search. the computing
On Saturday 19 February 2005 15:26, Ben wrote:
When I try to search for phrases using the MultiFieldQueryParser v1.8
from CVS, it gives me NullPointerException.
This has just been fixed in SVN (I assume you mean SVN, CVS still exists
but is read only and probably not updated anymore).
Thanks
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:09:49 +0100, Daniel Naber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 19 February 2005 15:26, Ben wrote:
When I try to search for phrases using the MultiFieldQueryParser v1.8
from CVS, it gives me NullPointerException.
This has just been fixed in SVN (I assume
We are doing the same exacting thing. We didn't test with so many documents.
The most we tested till now 3 million documents with 3GB file size.
I would be interested in seeing how you maintained replicated indices that r
in sync. The way we did was, run the indexer on each server independently.
I just beamed into the archive:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=30
..and it only has through Feb 1!
What's up?
Owen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Our index is currently about 40Gb.
The advantage of binding a user is that once a search is performed then
caching within lucene and in the application is very effective if
subsequent searches go back to the same box. Our initial searches are
usually in the sub 100milliS range while subsequent
I recorded a Meet Lucene presentation at JavaLobby. It is a
multimedia Flash video that shows slides with my voice recorded over
them which spans just over 20 minutes (you can jump to specific
slides).Check it out here:
http://www.javalobby.org/members-only/eps/meet-lucene/index.html?
13 matches
Mail list logo
