Ehrm,
Guys, I would recommend just filing INFRA requests here [1]. INFRA can set up
all the mailing lists below for you and are the only ones with Apache karma
necessary to do so.
I'd be happy to file the tickets, if you guys are OK with that.
Cheers,
Chris
[1]
Greets,
Lucene sub-projects traditionally have all JIRA notifications sent to the dev
list. However, not all Apache projects follow this convention -- some have
dedicated issues lists. Although it was not in our proposal, I think Lucy
should consider requesting such a list.
First, JIRA is
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:07:57AM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
I'd be happy to be a list mod for Lucy.
Great, thank you. :)
Oh, also it wasn't clear to me from the reply to this mail whether you guys
were about to file INFRA tickets to get the mailing lists set up or to try
and do
Marvin: even though Lucy already has a Jira project setup, one thing you
do still need to do is make sure all of the committers/members have the
appropriate perms to assign/resolve issues and to administer the project
(ie: add components, add versions, add more users to the developers list,
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:22:11AM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Marvin: even though Lucy already has a Jira project setup, one thing you
do still need to do is make sure all of the committers/members have the
appropriate perms to assign/resolve issues and to administer the project
(ie:
: As of this moment I'm still the only person with Project Role:
: Administrators. I'm not sure how that permission is normally handed out, but
: I seem to recall that not all Lucene committers have the same level of JIRA
: karma. Anybody know what the deal is with that?
I don't know that
Aparently i already had the neccessary karma to create the new Lucy SVN
repository, but I don't have the neccessary karma to *grant* karma, so
i've sent an email to the IPMC containing the neccessary patch...
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
-Hoss
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:58:03AM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
In general I don't think there are any set guidelines on how the Jira
Roles are used (they are totally independent of LDAP and SVN perms)
so the Lucy project can decide for itself -- but for now would just make
sure you aren't
+1, sounds good to me to have the additional lucy-issues@ lists per the
specification you mention below, Marvin...
Cheers,
Chris
On 7/24/10 10:16 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Greets,
Lucene sub-projects traditionally have all JIRA notifications sent to the dev
list.
Marvin,
Did you file a JIRA issue in the INFRA space to roll up all the other issues
like mailing lists, SVN, etc. Looks like you found the one I did for Tika - why
not just create something similar? If you already have, can you pass along the
ticket key so I (and others) could monitor it?
I just encountered something similar in OODT-ville, and the answer I got
back from INFRA was that they were going to phase out the current way that
JIRA is administered and move towards ³roles² rather than ³groups² in JIRA.
See here [1] for an explanation.
I think we can add people to the
Thanks Hoss!
On 7/24/10 12:01 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_l...@fucit.org wrote:
Aparently i already had the neccessary karma to create the new Lucy SVN
repository, but I don't have the neccessary karma to *grant* karma, so
i've sent an email to the IPMC containing the neccessary patch...
+1...
On 7/24/10 12:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:58:03AM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
In general I don't think there are any set guidelines on how the Jira
Roles are used (they are totally independent of LDAP and SVN perms)
so the Lucy
13 matches
Mail list logo
