On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:48:07PM -0700, Snider, Tim wrote:
> Are there problems using 2.6.18 vanilla for the OSS as well as MDS or is
> it just MDS?
Problems were just with MDS.
There is lost data on soft-RAID5 without raid5* patches. As expected ;-).
And client can't connect to MGS by Infiniban
: [Lustre-discuss] Vanilla kernel 2.6.18 & patches
thanks for the catch. tough:
1) we don't support server on 2.6.18 yet
2) even so, the filesystem looks corrupted because
mballoc was asked to free non-used block.
thanks, Alex
>>>>> Serge Ryabchun (SR) writes:
thanks for the catch. tough:
1) we don't support server on 2.6.18 yet
2) even so, the filesystem looks corrupted because
mballoc was asked to free non-used block.
thanks, Alex
> Serge Ryabchun (SR) writes:
SR> No. time to change EXT3_MOUNT_MBALLOC to 0x800
SR> Lustre: Lustre Clie
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:50:49PM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> >> > This patches work with OSS and clients on vanilla 2.6.18.
> >> > MDS has problem in mballoc code on 2.6.18, so I use 2.6.12.6 on MDS.
> >>
> >> You shouldn't use mballoc on the MDS at all.
>
> SR> And what is that?
>
> the f
> Serge Ryabchun (SR) writes:
SR> )
SR> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:56:03PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> > This patches work with OSS and clients on vanilla 2.6.18.
>> > MDS has problem in mballoc code on 2.6.18, so I use 2.6.12.6 on MDS.
>>
>> You shouldn't use mballoc on the MDS at
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:56:03PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > This patches work with OSS and clients on vanilla 2.6.18.
> > MDS has problem in mballoc code on 2.6.18, so I use 2.6.12.6 on MDS.
>
> You shouldn't use mballoc on the MDS at all.
And what is that?
Assertion failure in mb_free_b
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:42:51PM -0600, Robert Olson wrote:
>
> Oh, interesting ... can you put a MDS on a different architecture
> than the OSS servers? That might help with the issues I had getting
> installed on my G5 cluster.
OSS is x86_64 on i51xx
MDS is ia32 on i51xx https://bugzilla.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:56:03PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > This patches work with OSS and clients on vanilla 2.6.18.
> > MDS has problem in mballoc code on 2.6.18, so I use 2.6.12.6 on MDS.
>
> You shouldn't use mballoc on the MDS at all.
As I remember, two clients run bonie++ and frozen
most of version specific patches don`t need with last 1.5.95. it`s done
as part of patchless client.
umount_begin patch have one small bug. at kernels before 2.6.18
umount_begin called only at MNT_FORCE case, but at 2.6.18 and later
umount_begin called at any case.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 22:20, S
On Dec 21, 2006 22:20 +0200, Serge Ryabchun wrote:
> This patches work with OSS and clients on vanilla 2.6.18.
> MDS has problem in mballoc code on 2.6.18, so I use 2.6.12.6 on MDS.
You shouldn't use mballoc on the MDS at all.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster
Oh, interesting ... can you put a MDS on a different architecture
than the OSS servers? That might help with the issues I had getting
installed on my G5 cluster.
--bob
On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Serge Ryabchun wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:22:12PM -0700, Snider, Tim wrote:
There are
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:22:12PM -0700, Snider, Tim wrote:
> There are patches for the vanilla 2.6.18 kernel in Lustre 1.5.95. Does anyone
> know if they are complete and work? The alternative would be to use / port
> the patches that John Dunning has for 2.6.15.
> Thanks,
> Tim
This patches
From: Alexey Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:10:32 +0200
some time ago I finished patchless client for Lustre 1.5.95 (bug 11271)
and i tree exist 2.6.18-vanilla.series with patches need for lustre
server.
Does that mean there's stuff on top of the 2
some time ago I finished patchless client for Lustre 1.5.95 (bug 11271)
and i tree exist 2.6.18-vanilla.series with patches need for lustre
server.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 05:22, Snider, Tim wrote:
> There are patches for the vanilla 2.6.18 kernel in Lustre 1.5.95. Does
> anyone know if they are c
There are patches for the vanilla 2.6.18 kernel in Lustre 1.5.95. Does anyone
know if they are complete and work? The alternative would be to use / port the
patches that John Dunning has for 2.6.15.
Thanks,
Tim
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-di
15 matches
Mail list logo
