Thanks,
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
Center for Advanced Computing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(734)936-1985
On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2008 12:14 -0500, Brock Palen wrote:
>> if that is the bug causing this, is the fix till we upgrade to the
>> newer lustre, t
On Nov 18, 2008 12:14 -0500, Brock Palen wrote:
> if that is the bug causing this, is the fix till we upgrade to the
> newer lustre, to set statahead_max=0 again?
Yes, this is another statahead bug.
> I see this same behavior this morning on a compute node.
>
> Brock Palen
> www.umich.edu/~br
I see no errors,
if that is the bug causing this, is the fix till we upgrade to the
newer lustre, to set statahead_max=0 again?
I see this same behavior this morning on a compute node.
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
Center for Advanced Computing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(734)936-1985
On Nov 16,
Hi all,
I've successfully built lustre 1.6.6 against vanilla 2.6.22 + OFED 1.3.1.
However, I am getting warning on installation of the lustre modules about being
unable to create /proc entries. Is this something to worry about? Apart from
the /proc warning, the client seems to be running quite h
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:59 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2008 16:07 +0100, Reto Gantenbein wrote:
> > Why can't this bug being accessed? Even when I login with a bugzilla
> > account there is the message "You are not authorized to access bug
> > #15975".
>
> This bug was marked priva
