I suggest creating a new filesystem and rsync the data over the
network. I would not over complicate the situation.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Rayentray Tappa
rtappa.ascen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List!
As you may already know :) I'm now trying a lustre installation on a
mass storage
Alex:
For its worth, we gave up on backing up our MDS because of its sheer
size and the contents of our filesystem. We have close to 40TB of
space with very small files. Backing up MDS without LVM snapshot took
almost 5 days.
Its probally better to have a backup of your most important files and
Is there a facebook page?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Jeffrey Bennett j...@sdsc.edu wrote:
Hello,
No intention to spam but I would like to mention that there is a Lustre group
on LinkedIn for those interested.
The URL is http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=gid=1772375
jab
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:41:47PM +0800, emoly.liu wrote:
Robert Latham wrote:
Second favor: documentation... Can you send me a brief summary of
the new hints?
Sure
Thanks for the documentation. These explanations are good, but now
we've found a few problems. The naming issues are
Hello!
On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:41 AM, pascal.dev...@bull.net wrote:
Could anyone tell me if I made a mistake, if Lustre does not support
the
group lock or if it is a bug in Lustre ?
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Please file a bug. This is a bug in lustre introduced by lockless
Hello,
On 16 March 2009 12:41:20 pascal.dev...@bull.net wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the group lock Design at:
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel/2006-May/71.html
I checked the group lock capabilities with the programme
parallel_grouplock.c: