is the lustre to be opensourse forever?
what time there 2.0 released?___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
Saber Feki wrote, On 2009. 04. 13. 18:15:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to compile and install the lustre patchless client on
our cluster nodes running OpenSuse 11.0 with the kernel version 2.6.25.
Looking at the mailing list and in the lustre wiki, I was pointed to bug
14250. There, I find a
is the lustre to be opensourse forever?
what time there 2.0 released?___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
We've done smoe experiments with software RAID10 on Intel X-25E solid
state disks, focused on getting 4K random iops up very high.
We were at first greatly encouraged by the fact that our current
production MDS's based on a dedicate DDN 8500 multiple tiers of FC disks
with write cache on (older
What is the current version of the lustre-diagnostics rpm? The newest one I
have been able to find is lustre-diagnostics-1.4-cfs1.noarch.rpm from here:
http://downloads.lustre.org/public/tools/lustre-diagnostics/
Is there a new one or is that deprecated?
--
Andrew
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 14:29 +0200, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
Brian,
Arne,
Thanks a lot for the details.
NP.
So, even clients working on disjoint files/objects will experience that
their data are lost when one client is lost during recovery ?
Yes. Because, given the existing recovery design,
Thank you Tamas,
Actually, I'm trying to compile the lustre patchless client version 1.6.5.1.
Was is the same for you or you did it on a different lustre version.
I downloaded 2.6.27.tar.gz which contains all the patches I guess and
then used quilt to apply them and this is what I got.
Hello!
On Apr 13, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Jim Garlick wrote:
2) some quick tests of MDS create rates (through lustre now) on the
SSD
and DDN hardware where we seemed to get about 2350 creates/sec no
matter
what hardware we used, and posts from Oleg on this mailing list
indicating
that
