Hello there,
We have a disk usage update problem. You can find our software related info
below. Here is my problem description: We enabled disk qoutas on our lustre
file system. But not using quota, just for checking users' lustre disk
usage. It's a quicker way to getting disk usage than using
Hello old friends! I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
I have an interesting issue, on 1.6.6:
# cat /proc/fs/lustre/version
lustre: 1.6.6
kernel: patchless
build:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 20:06 +0800, Phil Schwan wrote:
Hello old friends!
Heya phik.
I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
Yay!
- one task creates a foo.working directory, does all its work
inside, then renames it to foo.done
- another task
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 21:09 +0800, Phil Schwan wrote:
G'day Brian! Glad to see you've stuck around!
:-)
It should be, except it isn't.
Don't ya just hate those?
Your steps are correct, I believe (Stu
may correct me), but we also tried that without any luck.
Hrm. Must be more subtle
Papp Tamás wrote:
The logs are full with this:
Nov 19 20:03:32 node1 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 10s!
[ll_ost_80:4894]
Nov 19 20:03:32 node1 kernel: CPU 3:
snip
Nov 19 20:03:34 node1 kernel: Lustre: Skipped 40339060 previous similar
messages 0; still busy with 3 active
Craig Prescott wrote, On 2009. 11. 19. 20:42:
Papp Tamás wrote:
The logs are full with this:
Nov 19 20:03:32 node1 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 10s!
[ll_ost_80:4894]
Nov 19 20:03:32 node1 kernel: CPU 3:
snip
Nov 19 20:03:34 node1 kernel: Lustre: Skipped 40339060 previous
Hello!
On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Phil Schwan wrote:
Hello old friends! I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
Long time no see! ;)
I have an interesting issue, on 1.6.6:
# cat /proc/fs/lustre/version
lustre: 1.6.6
kernel: patchless
build:
