Andreas...
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2010-03-17, at 02:59, Gregory Matthews wrote:
Gregory Matthews wrote:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
modprobe/6024
caller is set_ptldebug_header+0x41/0xa0 [libcfs]
Pid: 6024, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.27.39-default #2
Hi.
Is it possible to fsck on a disabled and drained OST that is mounted readonly?
We need to fsck an OST and would like to avoid a lengthy downtime while doing
it. My plan is to disable and drain the files from the OST and then remount it
read-only before running fsck on the partition. This
Hello!
On Mar 18, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Roy Dragseth wrote:
Is it possible to fsck on a disabled and drained OST that is mounted readonly?
We need to fsck an OST and would like to avoid a lengthy downtime while doing
it. My plan is to disable and drain the files from the OST and then remount
I am trying to compile lustre modules for Open suse 2.6.31 kernel
Unfortunately make fails with following error
/usr/src/lustre-1.8.2/lustre/llite/lloop.c: In function 'loop_set_fd'
/usr/src/lustre-1.8.2/lustre/llite/lloop.c:506: error: implicit declaration
of function 'blk_queue_hardsect_size'
On 2010-03-18, at 03:44, Gregory Matthews wrote:
thanks for the advice. I've compiled new lustre packages with the
suggested fix and am currently running racer. So far, the above bug
has
not reappeared... In the meantime, lustre just got
more compatible with the preempt kernel. Will this
On 2010-03-18, at 13:23, Wojciech Turek wrote:
I am trying to compile lustre modules for Open suse 2.6.31 kernel
Unfortunately make fails with following error
/usr/src/lustre-1.8.2/lustre/llite/lloop.c: In function 'loop_set_fd'
/usr/src/lustre-1.8.2/lustre/llite/lloop.c:506: error:
On 2010-03-18, at 11:36, Roy Dragseth wrote:
Is it possible to fsck on a disabled and drained OST that is mounted
readonly?
We need to fsck an OST and would like to avoid a lengthy downtime
while doing
it. My plan is to disable and drain the files from the OST and then
remount it
