Thank you, Bern. "df" claims there is some 442MB of data on the
volume, compared to neighbors with 285GB. That could well be a
fragment of a single, unsuccessful transfer attempt. I can run
lfs_find on it though and see what comes back. Was having problems
earlier, thought I got files back
On 2010-09-01, at 02:33, Brian O'Connor wrote:
> I seem to remember that the Windows Client was going to be released
> with V2.0
>
> Is this still active
There is still a Windows Native Client (WNC) project active. They are working
to stabilize the code and improve the IO performance to an acce
On Friday, September 03, 2010, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Friday, September 03, 2010, Bob Ball wrote:
> > We added a new OSS to our 1.8.4 Lustre installation. It has 6 OST of
> > 8.9TB each. Within a day of having these on-line, one OST stopped
> > accepting new files. I cannot get it to activat
On Friday, September 03, 2010, Bob Ball wrote:
> We added a new OSS to our 1.8.4 Lustre installation. It has 6 OST of
> 8.9TB each. Within a day of having these on-line, one OST stopped
> accepting new files. I cannot get it to activate. The other 5 seem fine.
>
> On the MDS "lctl dl" shows it
Hello Folks,
Can someone help me out figuring out what's wrong here? We have an
MDS/T that keeps causing problems. I have 2 dozen or so dumps from threads
crashing. The threads in question all appear to be either ll_mdt_rdpg_ ? or
ll_mdt_??
I can provide dumps on request, any help w
We added a new OSS to our 1.8.4 Lustre installation. It has 6 OST of
8.9TB each. Within a day of having these on-line, one OST stopped
accepting new files. I cannot get it to activate. The other 5 seem fine.
On the MDS "lctl dl" shows it IN, but not UP, and files can be read from it:
33 IN
We have installed lustre 1.8.2 and 1.8.4 client on Red hat 5. The lustre
modules are not loading during boot. In order to get the lustre file
system to mount we have to add
modprobe lustre
mount /lustre
to our /etc/rc.local file.
Here is a list of rpms loaded
kernel-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5_l
On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-09-03, at 09:46, Charles Taylor wrote:
>> and patching the kernel...
>>
>> ln -s /usr/src/lustre-1.8.4/ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches .
>> ln -s /usr/src/lustre-1.8.4/ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/
>> ldiskfs-2.6-
>> rhel5.series serie
On 2010-09-03, at 09:46, Charles Taylor wrote:
> and patching the kernel...
>
> ln -s /usr/src/lustre-1.8.4/ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches .
> ln -s /usr/src/lustre-1.8.4/ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-
> rhel5.series series
You shouldn't patch the kernel with the ldiskfs patch series
After installing the kernel source...
rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-194.3.1.0.1.el5.src.rpm
rpmbuild -bp kernel-2.6.spec
intalling the lustre source...
lustre-source-1.8.4-2.6.18_194.3.1.0.1.el5_lustre.1.8.4.x86_64.rpm
and patching the kernel...
ln -s /usr/src/lustre-1.8.4/ldiskfs/kernel_patches/pat
It could be both. We had good success with performance improvements up to 1GB
journals, and AFAIK Some customers had reduced their journal size to 128 MB
without significant performance impact to reduce RAM consumption on their OSS.
We haven't really made any testing with reduced journal size to
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 23:41 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Thursday, September 02, 2010, Frank Heckes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > for some of our OSSes a massive amount of errors like:
> >
> > Sep 2 20:28:15 jf61o02 kernel: blk_rq_check_limits: over max size
> > limit.
> >
> > appeari
lustre 2.0 isn't support RHEL4.
>>>
2010-07-15 Oracle, Inc.
* version 2.0.0
* Server support for kernels:
2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (RHEL 5)
2.6.18-164.11.1.0.1.el5 (OEL 5)
* Client support for unpatched kernels:
(see http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php?title
And another quick question - would this be more likely to be the journal
on the MDS, or the OSS servers?
On 02/09/10 17:38, Tina Friedrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 02/09/10 17:28, Tina Friedrich wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> thanks for your answer.
>>
Causing most grieve at the moment is that we
Hi,
I tried to compile lustre-client 2.0.0.1 on RHEL4 with kernel
2.6.9-89.0.28.EL-x86_64 and I got 3 errors and 1 warning during the
compile.
The compile is executed with -Werror option, and it fails in all 4 cases
* Error: lustre_compat25.h
CC [M] /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/lustre-2.0.0.1/lustre/
15 matches
Mail list logo
