Re: [Lustre-discuss] Question about "lfs find"

2010-10-06 Thread Bob Ball
in my experience a single (or small number) of lfs_find with lots of obd arguments was faster than doing all of them individually. go to lustre 1.8.4 (at least) and use lfs_migrate with your lfs_find list. it wasn't REAL fast, but it was REAL reliable. bob On 10/6/2010 5:24 PM, Michael Barn

[Lustre-discuss] Question about "lfs find"

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Barnes
Lustre users, With lfs find, is it faster/better to do multiple lfs find's with one --obd or one lfs find with multiple --obd flags? I ask, because I made a mistake and ran a lone lfs with a single --obd argument on an OST that I didn't intend to drain, and the erroneous lfs find was *much* q

[Lustre-discuss] File content lost when removing OSS

2010-10-06 Thread Gizo Nanava
Hello, while moving files from one OSS to another (we want to remove this OSS from the lustre fs, so all osts on this OSS were inactive ), we observed that many files lost their content. OSS removing was done as usual, first 'cp file file.tmp', and then 'mv file.tmp file'; Does anyb