On 2010-12-13, at 18:35, Nihir Parikh wrote:
> Hello Wang Yibin,
> Can I please get step by step information on how to run lnet_selftest?
This is described in the Lustre manual.
> From: Wang Yibin [mailto:wang.yi...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:12 PM
> To: Nihir Parikh
> Cc:
Hello Wang Yibin,
Can I please get step by step information on how to run lnet_selftest?
Thanks
Nihir
From: Wang Yibin [mailto:wang.yi...@oracle.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Nihir Parikh
Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-
Thanks. I LOVE existence proofs.
bob
On 12/13/2010 5:14 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
I did changed just the hostname on two last week
with no issues.
My IPs also remained the same, just a DNS update.
I did changed just the hostname on two last week with no issues. My IPs also
remained the same, just a DNS update.
From: Bob Ball [mailto:b...@umich.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:02 PM
To: Wojciech Turek
Cc: Lundgren, Andrew; Lustre discussion
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Renaming an
Not using heartbeat (Lustre 1.8.4 manual section 8.3?). As we've
added OSS, we've never explicitly placed the machine names in any
configuration.
Furthermore, no IP changes will be made, just the DNS name, so
perhaps we are safe after all?
bob
O
I think that Andreas got confused and thought that you want rename OST.
Renaming OSS is easy and don't require any Lustre reconfiguration if your
Lustre configuration is based on IP addresses and not hostnames.
If you have heartbeat, you need to change names in configuration
Best regards,
Wojci
Yes, just the DNS name. From Andreas' response, it would seem this is
not something I want to do.
bob
On 12/13/2010 4:11 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
> Are you talking about renaming the DNS name of the host machine, or something
> else?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lustre-discuss-bou
On 14/12/2010 05:54, Gary Molenkamp wrote:
> On the MDS (with an intended failover to a secondary) the mgs,mdt
> filesystem is created with:
>
> mkfs.lustre --fsname lfs --mdt --mgs \
> --mkfsoptions='-i 1024 -I 512' \
> --failnode=10.27.9@o2ib0 --failnode=10.27.9@o2ib0 \
>
Are you talking about renaming the DNS name of the host machine, or something
else?
-Original Message-
From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org
[mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Bob Ball
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 1:49 PM
To: Lustre discussion
Subjec
On 2010-12-13, at 13:48, Bob Ball wrote:
> For administrative reasons, we want to rename an OSS. It will retain
> the same IP addresses, and have the same OST. Does this present any
> problems that I should be aware of, or is it a no-brainer?
It's definitely not _easy_ to do this, but possible
For administrative reasons, we want to rename an OSS. It will retain
the same IP addresses, and have the same OST. Does this present any
problems that I should be aware of, or is it a no-brainer?
Thanks,
bob
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-di
Colin Faber wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2010 11:54 AM, Gary Molenkamp wrote:
>> I'm attempting to deploy a new lustre filesystem using lustre 1.8.5, but
>> this is my first stab at incorporating an IB network. I've deployed
>> several over tcp using 1.8.4 without issue, so I'm not sure if there is
>>
On 12/13/2010 11:54 AM, Gary Molenkamp wrote:
> I'm attempting to deploy a new lustre filesystem using lustre 1.8.5, but
> this is my first stab at incorporating an IB network. I've deployed
> several over tcp using 1.8.4 without issue, so I'm not sure if there is
> an IB configuration or a 1.8.
I'm attempting to deploy a new lustre filesystem using lustre 1.8.5, but
this is my first stab at incorporating an IB network. I've deployed
several over tcp using 1.8.4 without issue, so I'm not sure if there is
an IB configuration or a 1.8.5 issue here. Any assistance would be
appreciated.
Thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
