On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:07 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Those clients do a lot of read and write in Lustre filesystems but
thoses files will not be re-read soon, so it is useless to fill memory
with it. Moreover, when the client memory is full, Lustre performance
are really impacted.
Jason Rappleye a écrit :
On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:07 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Yes, that would totally make sense to do regardless of other methods.
Hmm... I do not want to patch 'cp' or 'dd' :)
You might want to have a look at this:
Hello,
why was the Lustre Roadmap deleted?
http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php?title=Lustre_Roadmap
Petr Hejl
--
Ing. Petr Hejl, CSc.
Ondrouškova 15, 63500 Brno
tel.: 608 374 535
email: ph...@lednice.org
___
Lustre-discuss
It's no longer valid and Oracle does not publish roadmaps.
I'd expect the upcoming LUG will be the best source of information for what is
coming from the Lustre community.
Kevin
On Mar 17, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Petr Hejl wrote:
Hello,
why was the Lustre Roadmap deleted?
After checking 2.6.35 kernel source code, POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE actually doesn't
do anything. So I don't know how it helps. Probably we should do
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED after reading?
Jay
On Mar 17, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Mar 17, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
